History Makes Nothing; People Do
Is history driven by enlightened Spirit and critical self-consciousness, with the unthinking masses trailing behind, or does nothing happen except through real people pursuing material interests? The quarrel decides whether ideas or life come first.
Marx and Engels bury Bruno Bauer's Critical Criticism under three hundred pages of ridicule and argument. Against the Bauers' doctrine that history is the work of Spirit while the uncomprehending Mass merely lags, they insist history in itself does nothing and possesses nothing — only living people, driven by material need, ever act. Written while Marx still leaned on Feuerbach, it catches him mid-stride from idealism toward the materialism he would state fully within the year, and opened the partnership that lasted until his death.
- critique
- materialism
- ideology
- idealism
- speculative philosophy
- abstraction
- methodology
- subjectivity
- agency
- intellectual history
- social critique
- emancipation
- religion
Enter a dialogue
- Bruno Bauer's circle prized 'Critical Criticism' and looked down on the common 'Mass'. Why do you mock them with the Gospel's words about God sending his only son?
- Owners feel at home in the present order and workers feel destroyed by it, yet both count as estranged from their humanity. Why include the owners?
- If history in itself does nothing and only real people act, how do you explain outcomes no one intended and everyone opposed?
- Why can and must workers free themselves, rather than wait for enlightened critics to think on their behalf?
- Turning real apples and pears into a general idea 'Fruit', then calling apples its disguises, is speculation in your eyes. Is 'the working class' a Fruit too?