Changing the World, Not Interpreting It
Is the mind a spectator that reflects a world it merely looks upon, or are human beings formed by the practical activity through which they change it? On the answer hangs whether philosophy explains the world or remakes it.
In eleven private notes settling accounts with Feuerbach, Marx rejects a materialism that stays contemplative. People do not gaze at reality; they transform it through practice and are themselves shaped by the conditions they alter — so the human essence is no inner kernel but, as the sixth thesis has it, the ensemble of social relations. Engels found the jottings after Marx's death and printed them in 1888; the eleventh, contrasting interpreting the world with changing it, is carved on his grave in Highgate.
- praxis
- materialism
- social change
- social ontology
- alienation
- truth
- critique of ideology
- historical materialism
Enter a dialogue
- Feuerbach showed that religion is human life projected into heaven. What drives the earthly world itself to split off and build a kingdom in the clouds?
- Someone tries to change by thinking harder about themselves. Why do you say changing our circumstances and changing ourselves are one and the same act?
- A dispute over whether thinking grasps reality, when cut off from practice, is mere scholastic hair-splitting. How does acting on a thought prove it true?
- Someone feels a true self lies hidden inside, untouched by class or work. If the human essence is the web of social relations, what is that feeling?
- Feuerbach wanted real, touchable things instead of abstract thought. Why is a materialism that only looks at the world still not enough?