The Wage Bargain Undone
Why is the exchange between worker and employer, which looks like a free and fair trade, actually the very form of the worker's dependence? What the wage really buys is the question.
Marx explains to a workers' club that labour is a commodity, sold near the cost of keeping the worker alive and able to work, while the value produced beyond that goes to capital — so wages and profit move against each other, and the freedom to sell one's labour is itself a bondage. Serialised in his revolutionary newspaper until Prussia shut it down in 1849, the argument broke off unfinished. Engels reissued it in 1891, replacing labour with labour-power throughout — the distinction on which Capital would later turn.
- wages
- wage labor
- capital
- labor
- labor power
- profit
- competition
- exchange value
- surplus value
- class struggle
- production
Enter a dialogue
- A worker's twelve hours are bought like two pounds of sugar, measured by the clock, not the scale. What does that make of the worker's own life?
- A person signs a job contract freely and calls it a fair deal — on your account, why is that very freedom the shape of their dependence?
- A worker's pay rises, but the employer's profit rises faster. In what sense do you still say wages and profit move against each other?
- Economists say the fatter capital grows, the better its worker is fed. Why do you call the resulting pay rises golden chains the workers forge themselves?
- Pay stays the same while bread and meat grow dearer, as after the bad harvest of 1847. Why is that already a wage cut?