PhilosopherNorth Africa

Philo of Alexandria

The Jewish allegorist who read Moses through Plato

30 works · 2,924 passages grounded

Lifespan
~20 BCE – 50 CE
School
Platonism
Also known as
Philo Judaeus
Wikipedia

The mind

In first-century Alexandria, some of the readers who scoffed at the Bible had been raised on it. Men brought up under the Law of Moses said the Tower of Babel was the same kind of fable as Homer's giants piling up mountains to reach heaven. Others read the Sabbath and circumcision as symbols of truths about the soul, and concluded that once the truth was understood, the practice could be dropped. Outsiders mocked circumcision itself. Philo of Alexandria spent his writing life answering all three. His answer was that the Law of Moses, read rightly, teaches what the best of Greek philosophy teaches, and that Moses taught it first.

He could make that claim because he stood in both worlds. He was born about 20 BCE into one of the richest Jewish families in the city. His brother Alexander, the alabarch, or chief customs official, paid for the gold and silver on nine gates of the Temple in Jerusalem, and Philo went to that Temple at least once, to pray and to sacrifice. His schooling, though, was Greek: grammar, then geometry, then music, each of them, as he put it, a servant preparing him for philosophy. He read his Bible in the Greek translation called the Septuagint, and how much Hebrew he knew is still debated.

The tool that joined the two worlds was allegory, reading a story as a coded account of something else. In his long commentary on Genesis, Adam is the mind, Eve the senses, and the serpent pleasure. For the six days of creation he reached for Plato's Timaeus: God first conceives the world as a plan in his mind, then builds the visible world from it. That God lies beyond human knowing. Between him and the world stands the Logos, a Greek word meaning both word and reason. For Philo the Logos is what human minds can understand of God, and it is the power that divides the formless mass of things into opposed halves — hot and cold, day and night — and holds them in balance. Heraclitus had boasted of the unity of opposites as his own discovery; Moses, Philo replied, had taught it long before.

Yet he would not follow the allegorists who dropped the practice once they had the meaning. In On the Migration of Abraham he argued that the literal law stands to its meaning as the body to the soul, and that caring for the body keeps the soul alive.

He wanted leisure for this work and lost it. In the middle of On the Special Laws, his account of the Mosaic code for Greek readers, he complains that envy has dragged him from philosophy into the sea of public affairs. He names no event; the likeliest is 38 CE, the year a mob set up statues of the emperor Gaius in Alexandria's synagogues, drove the Jews into one quarter of the city and looted their homes, and thirty-eight members of the Jewish council of elders were flogged in the theatre. Philo blamed the Roman prefect, Flaccus, for handing the Jews over. When the community sent an embassy to Gaius in 39–40 CE, Philo led it, according to the Jewish historian Josephus. His own On the Embassy to Gaius shows an emperor who hurried the envoys from room to room of his villas giving orders about windows, asked why they did not eat pork, and dismissed them as more foolish than wicked for not believing he was a god.

The pull of Rome ran through his own family. In a dialogue that survives only in Armenian, Philo argues against his nephew Tiberius Julius Alexander, who held that animals can reason. Josephus wrote that this nephew did not keep his ancestral customs. He became prefect of Egypt in 66 CE and that year turned his legions on the Jews of Alexandria; in 70 he was second-in-command to Titus, the future emperor, at the siege of Jerusalem.

Philo died around 50 CE, and his books survived because Christians wanted them. Clement of Alexandria, a Christian teacher in the same city around 200 CE, took over his reading of Hagar, Abraham's servant, as the general learning that serves philosophy. Eusebius, the fourth-century bishop of Caesarea, catalogued his writings and took the Jewish ascetics of On the Contemplative Life for early Christian monks. Jewish tradition kept almost none of his thought. In 1575 Azariah dei Rossi, a Jewish scholar in Mantua, gave him four chapters of his Light of the Eyes, faulted him for reading the Torah in Greek and for allegorising too freely, and declined either to acquit or to convict him. In 1947 Harry Wolfson, a historian of philosophy at Harvard, argued that Philo founded the religious philosophy of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Scholars now place him among the Middle Platonists, the Platonists of the centuries around his own, and still argue over how original he was.

Key concepts

What is the Logos in Philo's thought?

The Logos is God's reason, and the part of God that human minds can understand. It stands between a God beyond knowing and the world: first as the plan God conceived before building the visible world, then as the Divider that cuts the formless mass of things into opposed halves, hot and cold, day and night, and holds them in balance. Philo also reads it as the sinless high priest in whose keeping a fallen soul finds refuge.

What are God's powers, and why does Philo need them?

They are the ways God acts on the world without being contained in it. Chief among them are the creative power, which made the world, and the kingly power, which rules it; Philo reads the names God and Lord as naming these two powers rather than God himself, and the cherubim at Eden's gate as goodness and sovereignty. The powers also keep God clear of evil, since he leaves punishment to subordinate ones.

Why can God be known to exist but never known in himself?

Because every name and image marks one thing off from others, and nothing stands beside God to be marked off from. His powers and works show that he is; nothing shows what he is. So the face, anger and repenting that Scripture gives him are concessions, spoken as a teacher speaks to beginners. For Philo a soul that searches for God's essence enters darkness, and its reward is to learn that he cannot be grasped.

Does Philo's allegory replace the literal meaning of Scripture?

No. Allegory reads a verse as a coded account of the soul, so that Adam is the mind and the Tower of Babel a fortress of vice, but the second sense does not abolish the first. Against fellow Jews who kept the meaning of the Sabbath and circumcision and dropped the practices, Philo argued that the literal law is to its meaning what the body is to the soul: caring for the one keeps the other alive.

What is the law of nature, and how does Moses' law relate to it?

It is the single law by which the world itself is governed, to which the laws of particular cities are only additions. Moses began his law with the creation of the world, Philo argues, to show that the written commandments agree with that order, so whoever keeps them lives in step with nature and becomes a citizen of the world. The patriarchs kept it before anything was written: living laws, of which the written ones are copies.

Themes of the Mind

Concepts that recur together across the corpus held here, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of this philosopher's writing each one occupies.

Moses First, and Greek Learning as His Servant

Can a people's ancient law and the best of Greek philosophy be one truth? Philo staked his writing life on yes, and on Moses having taught it before the Greeks.

His schooling was Greek, grammar, then geometry, then music, each study in his words a servant preparing him for philosophy, as Hagar served Sarah. He would not rank the Greeks above Moses, though. Other lawgivers issued bare commands; Moses began his law with the making of the world, so that whoever keeps it lives in step with nature and becomes a citizen of the world. Heraclitus boasted of the unity of opposites as his own discovery, and Philo replied that Moses had taught it long before. Plato wished that philosophers were kings; Moses, on Philo's reading, was both, and lawgiver, priest and prophet besides.

  • philosophy
  • wisdom
  • education
  • law
  • natural law
  • scripture
  • knowledge
  • truth
  • virtue

Allegory That Keeps the Letter Alive

When a sacred text reads like myth or bare rule, must a reader choose between scoffing and obeying blindly? Philo read every verse for a second sense and refused to let the second sense cancel the first.

Allegory, for Philo, is reading a story as a coded account of the soul: Adam is the mind, Eve the senses, the serpent pleasure. It answered readers raised under the Law who called the Tower of Babel a fable like Homer's giants, since the tower became a fortress the vices raise against heaven. The same method tempted other allegorists to treat the Sabbath and circumcision as symbols only, to be dropped once understood. Philo refused them. The literal law is to its meaning what the body is to the soul, and caring for the one keeps the other alive.

  • allegory
  • scriptural interpretation
  • scripture
  • symbolism
  • religious law
  • ritual
  • sabbath
  • interpretation
  • language

A God Who Is, but Cannot Be Grasped

What can a mind know of a God with no body, no place and no proper name? Philo's answer marks the limit of human knowledge and makes reaching that limit the soul's reward.

Scripture speaks of God's face, of his repenting, of his going down to Babel, and Philo took none of it literally: a face implies a body, and a place one could leave implies that God is somewhere rather than everywhere. God has no proper name, because a name marks one thing off from others and nothing stands beside him; Lord and God name two of his powers, the one that rules the world and the one that made it. A soul can know that God is, never what he is. Punishment he leaves to subordinate powers, so that nothing evil proceeds from him directly.

  • divine transcendence
  • theology
  • knowledge
  • divine attributes
  • divine powers
  • divine causation
  • humility
  • piety
  • god

The Logos Between God and the World

If God lies beyond human knowing, how does anything of him reach the world, or a mind? Philo's answer is the Logos, word and reason at once, the pattern of creation and its dividing blade.

Reading the six days of Genesis through Plato's Timaeus, Philo has God first conceive the world as a plan in his mind and then build the visible world from it; the days are an order of rank, since time itself came into being with the world. Between that God and the world stands the Logos, what human minds can understand of him. It divides the formless mass of things into opposed halves, hot and cold, day and night, and holds them in balance. It is also the high priest free of every wrong, and the first city of refuge to which a fallen soul can run.

  • divine word
  • divine reason
  • creation
  • cosmology
  • intelligible world
  • order
  • divine providence
  • time
  • divine powers

The Soul's Migration Away from Self-Love

What must a mind leave before it can find what made it? Philo read Abraham's departures as the soul's journey out of body, senses and speech, and away from the belief that anything it holds is its own.

Eve names her son Cain, possession, and Philo hears the mind's oldest mistake: believing that what it holds is its own, when the land belongs to God and its people are strangers and sojourners. Cain's line becomes the life of self-love, and pleasure arrives dressed like a courtesan promising every good thing. Abraham's road out of Chaldea is a mind turning from the stars to their maker, leaving body, senses and speech in turn. The road ends beyond effort: Philo reads the trance that falls on Abraham at sunset as prophecy, the divine spirit coming in when the mind's own light sets.

  • soul
  • mind
  • sense perception
  • pleasure
  • passions
  • embodiment
  • contemplation
  • self-knowledge
  • divine inspiration
  • virtue

Providence Tested by a Mob and an Emperor

Does the providence that orders the world show itself in what happens to a city and its rulers? Dragged from study into public affairs, Philo wrote the riots and the embassy to Gaius as its evidence.

Philo wanted leisure for philosophy and complained that envy had dragged him into the sea of public affairs. In the year 38 a mob set statues of the emperor in Alexandria's synagogues and thirty-eight elders were flogged in the theatre. He blamed the prefect Flaccus and told his fall and death as divine justice, counting the wounds as matching the Jews he had killed. Leading the embassy to Gaius, as Josephus reports, he met an emperor who dismissed the envoys as foolish for not believing he was a god. Beneath the politics runs an older claim: only the wise are free, whatever the law says.

  • divine providence
  • justice
  • political power
  • tyranny
  • religious freedom
  • freedom
  • fortune
  • punishment
  • political authority
  • fear

By the numbers

works held
30
passages traced
2,924
concepts traced
1,824
thematic clusters
5

Concepts that travel together

The wheel takes the leading concepts of these writings and shows how often they come up together. The wider the band between two, the more passages speak of both. Among them, most often together: “allegory” and “virtue”.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 8 concepts, joined by 28 pairings. 77 pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
allegoryvirtue109
reasonvirtue84
soulvirtue81
virtuewisdom67
educationvirtue65
divine providencevirtue48
reasonsoul47
allegorysoul45
allegorywisdom30
allegoryreason26
educationwisdom19
allegoryeducation18
cosmologydivine providence18
educationreason17
allegorydivine providence14
soulwisdom14
allegorycosmology13
divine providencereason13
cosmologysoul10
educationsoul10
cosmologyvirtue9
divine providencesoul9
divine providencewisdom9
reasonwisdom8
divine providenceeducation6
cosmologyreason5
cosmologywisdom2
cosmologyeducation1

The arc of a career

A cell's weight is that concept's share of the work's passages, so a column can be read downwards as well as a row across. Densest: cosmology in On the Eternity of the World, 82.6%.

Density 0% 82.6%

Concept density per work, chronological 30 works, in the order they were written. 8 concept columns, ranked by total weight. 89 further concepts fall outside the columns shown.
WorkYearvirtueallegorysoulreasoncosmologydivine providencewisdomeducation
Against Flaccus0%0%0%0%0%6.3%0%0%
Allegorical Interpretation38.3%13.1%18.7%17.8%1.9%7%5.1%0.9%
Every Good Man Is Free63.8%0%8.6%5.2%0%0%10.3%8.6%
On Abraham34.4%11.1%8.9%7.8%8.9%13.3%1.1%1.1%
On Cultivation37.5%18.8%6.3%10.9%1.6%10.9%6.3%12.5%
On Dreams33.1%18%12.9%12.4%7.3%7.3%6.7%6.2%
On Drunkenness32%6.7%8%18.7%1.3%2.7%12%10.7%
On Flight and Finding40.5%13.5%9.5%13.5%1.4%6.8%9.5%16.2%
On Joseph10%2.2%0%3.3%1.1%3.3%4.4%1.1%
On Planting33.3%10%18.3%8.3%10%5%13.3%5%
On Rewards and Punishments31.8%4.5%4.5%1.5%0%10.6%4.5%1.5%
On Sobriety52%20%8%0%0%8%16%0%
On the Change of Names43.2%16.8%7.4%5.3%2.1%11.6%10.5%10.5%
On the Cherubim27.8%9.3%13%5.6%11.1%9.3%5.6%11.1%
On the Confusion of Tongues23.6%13.9%16.7%9.7%11.1%8.3%2.8%0%
On the Contemplative Life9.1%6.1%3%3%0%3%6.1%6.1%
On the Creation of the World4.8%3.6%7.2%6%15.7%1.2%2.4%0%
On the Decalogue6.6%1.6%3.3%3.3%4.9%4.9%0%3.3%
On the Embassy to Gaius9.8%0%0%1.5%0%3%0%2.3%
On the Eternity of the World0%0%0%1.4%82.6%4.3%0%0%
On the Giants and On the Unchangeableness of God34.5%13.1%14.3%11.9%1.2%3.6%10.7%2.4%
On the Life of Moses10.2%1.9%0.9%3.2%8.8%13.4%0.5%1.9%
On the Migration of Abraham39.1%26.1%15.2%10.9%3.3%6.5%12%4.3%
On the Posterity of Cain46.2%16.7%7.7%12.8%0%6.4%10.3%15.4%
On Mating with the Preliminary Studies41.9%14.5%11.3%11.3%3.2%3.2%6.5%32.3%
On the Sacrifices of Abel and Cain50%16.7%13.6%16.7%0%7.6%9.1%10.6%
On the Virtues31.2%0%3.2%6.5%1.1%11.8%6.5%1.1%
On the Special Laws10.7%1.8%4.4%5%3.9%4.2%1.8%3.1%
The Worse Attacks the Better48.8%11%18.3%13.4%4.9%4.9%4.9%8.5%
Who Is the Heir of Divine Things?19.6%9.8%17.9%8%11.6%4.5%10.7%2.7%

Works held

Titles in your language, the original beneath in brackets; “lit.” marks our own translation where no English edition exists. Side chips show which full texts are held.

  1. Against Flaccus (In Flaccum)

    Written as a demonstration of divine justice, this account of the Alexandrian riots of 38 CE and of the prefect Philo blamed for them stands with his historical and apologetic works.

    EN
  2. Allegorical Interpretation (Legum allegoriae I–III)

    The first surviving treatise of the Allegorical Commentary, Philo's long verse-by-verse reading of Genesis, covering its second and third chapters in three books.

    EN
  3. Every Good Man Is Free (Quod omnis probus liber sit)

    Written in the manner of the Greek schools rather than as commentary on Moses, it is, with On the Eternity of the World, one of Philo's philosophical treatises.

    EN
  4. On Abraham (De Abrahamo)

    The first of Philo's lives of the patriarchs in the Exposition of the Law, following On the Creation of the World; its companions on Isaac and Jacob are lost, and On Joseph continues the set.

    EN
  5. On Cultivation (De agricultura)

    Noah the farmer is a subject Philo splits across two treatises; this first one is built on the difference between near-synonyms, and On Planting continues it.

    EN
  6. On Dreams (De somniis I–II)

    A treatise of the Allegorical Commentary, in two surviving books on the dreams of Jacob, Joseph and Pharaoh's court.

    EN
  7. On Drunkenness (De ebrietate)

    Of the two books on drunkenness known in antiquity, this is the one that survives; it sits between On Planting and On Sobriety in the Allegorical Commentary's run on Noah and the vine.

    EN
  8. On Flight and Finding (De fuga et inventione)

    Hagar's flight and the angel who finds her, Genesis 16:6–14, read within the Allegorical Commentary.

    EN
  9. On Joseph (De Josepho)

    The life of the statesman in Philo's series of patriarch lives within the Exposition of the Law. It follows On Abraham; lives of Isaac and Jacob, now lost, once stood between them.

    EN
  10. On Mating with the Preliminary Studies (De congressu eruditionis gratia)

    Philo's reading of Genesis 16 as a theory of education, set within the Allegorical Commentary; On Flight and Finding continues Hagar's story.

    EN
  11. On Planting (De plantatione)

    The second of Philo's two treatises on Noah as farmer, turning from farming in general to the planting of the vineyard.

    EN
  12. On Rewards and Punishments (De praemiis et poenis et de exsecrationibus)

    The closing treatise of the Exposition of the Law, on the rewards, punishments, blessings and curses the Law sets before its hearers.

    EN
  13. On Sobriety (De sobrietate)

    A short sequel to On Drunkenness in the Allegorical Commentary, on Noah waking and pronouncing his blessings and curse. Its Greek title names exactly that: what Noah prayed for and cursed once sober.

    EN
  14. On the Change of Names (De mutatione nominum)

    Genesis 17 and its renamings, from Abram and Sarai to Jacob and Joshua, read in the Allegorical Commentary; it also carries Philo's clearest statement that God has no proper name.

    EN
  15. On the Cherubim (De Cherubim)

    Two short commentaries joined under one title: the cherubim at Eden's gate, then the birth of Cain. Within the Allegorical Commentary it picks up where the three books of Allegorical Interpretation stop.

    EN
  16. On the Confusion of Tongues (De confusione linguarum)

    The Tower of Babel in the Allegorical Commentary, opening with a defence of Genesis against critics who likened it to Greek myth.

    EN
  17. On the Contemplative Life (De vita contemplativa)

    A portrait of the Therapeutae, classed with Philo's historical and apologetic writings; it opens by referring back to his account of the Essenes, the active life to this contemplative one.

    EN
  18. On the Creation of the World (De opificio mundi)

    The overture to Philo's Exposition of the Law, the series that goes on to lives of the patriarchs and a code of laws. It stands apart as his reading of the creation story in its literal order.

    EN
  19. On the Decalogue (De decalogo)

    The hinge of the Exposition of the Law, turning from the lives of the patriarchs to the written law.

    EN
  20. On the Embassy to Gaius (Legatio ad Gaium)

    The companion of Against Flaccus: an eyewitness history of the embassy Philo led to Gaius, and the fullest account he left of his own public life.

    EN
  21. On the Eternity of the World (De aeternitate mundi)

    Among Philo's philosophical treatises, the one that names the Greek schools and their arguments most openly.

    EN
  22. On the Giants and On the Unchangeableness of God (De gigantibus; Quod Deus sit immutabilis)

    Two treatises that editions usually separate but that read as one commentary, in the Allegorical Commentary, on the verses of Genesis leading up to the flood.

    EN
  23. On the Life of Moses (De vita Mosis I–II)

    Philo's biography of Moses in two books, usually counted with the Exposition of the Law though it stands on its own.

    EN
  24. On the Migration of Abraham (De migratione Abrahami)

    Abraham's call in Genesis 12, read as the soul's migration toward God; in the Allegorical Commentary it follows On the Confusion of Tongues in the order of Genesis.

    EN
  25. On the Posterity of Cain (De posteritate Caini)

    The last of the Cain treatises in the Allegorical Commentary, following Cain from his exile through his descendants.

    EN
  26. On the Sacrifices of Abel and Cain (De sacrificiis Abelis et Caini)

    One of the run of treatises on Cain and Abel in the Allegorical Commentary, taking up the brothers' offerings in Genesis 4.

    EN
  27. On the Special Laws (De specialibus legibus I–IV)

    The largest work in the Exposition of the Law, in four books; it follows On the Decalogue and is followed by On the Virtues.

    EN
  28. On the Virtues (De virtutibus)

    A pendant to On the Special Laws in the Exposition of the Law, gathering laws under the virtues they train rather than under the Ten Commandments.

    EN
  29. The Worse Attacks the Better (Quod deterius potiori insidiari soleat)

    It follows On the Sacrifices of Abel and Cain in the Allegorical Commentary and carries the brothers' story on to the murder itself.

    EN
  30. Who Is the Heir of Divine Things? (Quis rerum divinarum heres sit)

    Best known for its long passage on the Logos dividing the world into opposites, this reading of God's covenant with Abraham in Genesis 15 belongs to the Allegorical Commentary.

    EN
Begin a dialogue with Philo of Alexandria

— or wander to another mind

Set two minds against each other

Each of these is a question the two of them answer differently. Choose one and they argue it out, both drawing on the texts held here.