Ritual Law Explained Twice: As Practice and as Symbol
Can a rite outsiders mock be defended on their terms and still mean more than they see? Philo's answer is to give each law two reasons.
Having treated the Ten Commandments as headings, Philo files every other law of the Pentateuch beneath one of them and explains each to readers who meet it from outside. Circumcision, mocked by outsiders though the Egyptians practise it too, is defended first on grounds of health and cleanliness, then read as a symbol: of cutting away the pleasures that delude the mind, and of a person knowing himself instead of claiming to be the maker of man. The laws against images come under the second commandment; the Temple, priesthood and sacrifices follow; oaths, the Sabbath, the ten festivals and the honour due to parents fill the second book.
- religious law
- symbolism
- worship
- priesthood
- sacrifice
- sabbath
- ritual
Enter a dialogue
- Defending circumcision on grounds of health before its symbolism, aren't you conceding that its mockers set the terms?
- The law says a virtuous person's word should be his oath. What would someone's word have to be like for an oath to add nothing?
- Someone works without pause and feels emptied. Why do you say the Sabbath rests the body and also gives the soul its best thoughts about God?
- Once every rite also has a symbolic meaning, someone may decide the meaning is enough and drop the practice. Is that the risk of reading laws twice?
- A priest's body must be unblemished, yet his soul matters more, since it is made in God's image. What would a blemished soul look like?