A God Who Has No Proper Name
What can a person call the being who made everything? Philo's answer is that nothing fits, and that the titles Scripture uses are a concession to human need.
A name marks one thing off from others, and nothing stands beside God, so God has no proper name at all. When Moses asks what to tell the people, the answer is 'I am that I am', which Philo takes to mean that it is God's nature to be, not to be named; when Jacob, after wrestling, asks the name of his opponent, he is refused. 'Lord' and 'God' name the kingly and the creative powers, which is why Philo can read 'the Lord was seen by Abraham' without claiming that anyone has seen the cause of all things.
- language
- speech
- scriptural interpretation
- allegory
- divine causation
- humility
- piety
Enter a dialogue
- Asked his name, God answers 'I am that I am'. Why do you hear in it that his nature is to be, not to be named?
- Calling every scriptural title of God a mere concession, don't you leave believers worshipping a blank?
- After wrestling, Jacob asks the unseen Master, 'Tell me thy name,' and is refused. What should a seeker take from a question left unanswered?
- How is refusing God a proper name different from saying nothing can be known about him at all?