Why the Curse Falls on Canaan
When does wickedness deserve punishment: while it lies dormant, or once it moves? Philo's answer turns an apparent injustice in Genesis into a theory of guilt.
Ham sees his father lying drunk and uncovered and tells his brothers; Noah wakes and curses not Ham but Ham's son Canaan, who took no part. Philo finds the answer in the names. Ham means warm, and warmth in a body means fever, in a soul wickedness: a disease lying dormant. Canaan means commotion, the same wickedness once it stirs. So the curse falls on the grandson because it falls on the sin at the moment it passes from inclination into deed, which is when it deserves punishment.
- action
- law and punishment
- justice
- moral psychology
- vice
- opportunity
- passions
- freedom
Enter a dialogue
- Wickedness has two conditions, resting and in motion, and justice strikes only the second. Why does it spare wickedness that merely sits in the soul?
- You read Ham, Noah's son, as wickedness lying dormant and Canaan as the same wickedness once it stirs. Is someone with an unspoken resentment already guilty?
- Noah curses Ham's innocent son Canaan, which still looks unjust. Doesn't your reading of the names simply explain that injustice away?
- Ham sees his father drunk and uncovered and tells his brothers. Is the telling already a sin, or only what the telling sets in motion?
- If only the deed deserves punishment, what does a person owe for the wickedness they carry but never let move?