Whose Word Is the Abhidhamma?
The Abhidhamma reads like a technical catalogue, and one of its books was set down two centuries after the Buddha died. Whether such texts can count as the Buddha's own teaching is the challenge the introduction takes on first.
Before explaining a single class of mind, the commentary defends its scripture. The Buddha, it tells, taught the Abhidhamma to the gods in the Heaven of the Thirty-three, his mother foremost among them, and gave its substance to Sāriputta, who passed it to human hearers. A disputant objects that the Kathāvatthu was composed long after by a disciple. The reply is that the disciple followed a framework the Buddha had laid down, so the whole may still be called the Buddha's word.
- abhidhamma
- classification
- knowledge
- wisdom
- liberation
Enter a dialogue
- You tell how the Buddha first taught the Abhidhamma to the gods, his mother foremost. Why should gods hear the deepest analysis before humans?
- A disputant objects that a disciple wrote the Kathāvatthu long after the Buddha died. How can a later book still be the Buddha's word?
- Sāriputta receives only the outline from the Buddha and fills in the rest. How much may a student add before a teaching stops being the teacher's?
- The Abhidhamma lists and defines states of mind with no hearer in view, no story and no occasion. Why should such a catalogue rank above the living discourses?
- A future Buddha told he will awaken trusts the prediction like a law of nature, since Buddhas do not speak falsely. Is such trust wise?