How a Teaching Disappears
A teaching can die out even while people still revere it. What keeps it alive, the people who practise it or the people who remember its words, is the question a famine forced on the monks of Sri Lanka.
Buddhaghosa's answer is learning. Practice, he argues, fades first, as monks stop reaching the path and stop correcting one another, but it can always be rebuilt while the texts survive, and nothing can be rebuilt once they are lost. That is why sixty monks stayed through a famine to guard the scriptures, and why, when the meditators in rag robes argued that practice was the root, the preachers won. Rules laid down early serve the same end, he adds, like a dyke built before a reservoir leaks.
- teaching
- monastic discipline
- monastic life
- knowledge
- renunciation
- faith
- insight meditation
Enter a dialogue
- When famine struck Sri Lanka, sixty monks refused a god's raft to stay and guard the scriptures. What were they protecting that meditation alone could not keep?
- The rag-robed meditators say practice is the root of the teaching, the preachers say learning, and the meditators fall silent. Why should learning win that argument?
- At the last of the five disappearances, the Buddha's relics gather where he woke and vanish in one flame. Why end with relics, not books?
- Without rules laid down in advance, you say, the teaching would last five hundred years, not a thousand. How do rules buy a teaching time?
- The Kālāmas complain that every passing teacher praises his own doctrine and runs down the rest. On what, in your reading, should such doubters rely?