The Chain Across Three Lives
Twelve conditions lead from ignorance through craving to birth, ageing and death. Whether that chain describes one moment or many lifetimes, and where it can be broken, is what the longest section of the book sets out to answer.
The commentary reads the chain as running across three lives: past ignorance and formations yield the consciousness and body of this life; this life's craving, clinging and becoming yield a future birth and its death. It finds three joints and four groups in the twelve, and refuses to treat ignorance as a first cause, since ignorance has its own conditions. The Buddha taught the chain forward, backward and from the middle, it explains, as men gathering a vine might start at its root, its tip or its middle.
- dependent origination
- ignorance
- karma
- rebirth
- causation
- craving
- suffering
- feeling
- consciousness
Enter a dialogue
- Gathering a vine, men start at the root, at the tip, or in the middle going either way. Why teach the chain of causes in all four orders?
- Ignorance has conditions of its own, you insist, so it is no first cause. Then why does the chain of causes begin with it at all?
- Past causes produced this life, and this life's craving is already shaping the next, on your reading. Where in an ordinary day is the next life being made?
- Craving ends where it arose, at the sights and sounds it fed on, like a robber caught at the scene. Why must it be stopped there?
- Someone in deep grief traces it backwards, from loss to craving to ignorance. What does reading the chain from its end give them?