The Discourse on Mindfulness, Line by Line
The discourse claims that four kinds of mindfulness are the one way to the end of sorrow. Who it was taught to, what "one way" means and how it reaches into walking and eating are what the commentary sets out to settle.
Buddhaghosa treats the mindfulness discourse as a practical manual and reads every phrase as an instruction. The Kurus heard it, he argues, because a kind climate kept them healthy enough in body and mind to take in something deep. "One way" he takes in several senses at once, and he refuses the reading that it is walked only once. Clear comprehension carries mindfulness into ordinary acts: a monk asks why before he looks, and walks knowing that no "I" is doing the walking.
- mindfulness
- meditation
- insight meditation
- perception
- concentration
- spiritual practice
- awakening
Enter a dialogue
- The Buddha taught mindfulness to the Kurus, you say, because a kind climate kept them sound in body and mind. Why should health matter for a deep teaching?
- Walking, on your reading, is intention and the shifting elements of the body, with no "I" doing it. What changes for someone who walks this way?
- Before turning to look at something, a monk is to ask himself why he is looking. What goes wrong when someone looks simply because the urge arose?
- A meditator plagued by hunger, insects or snakes should recall the suffering of countless past lives rather than quit. Does that lighten the hardship?
- Mindfulness of the body, feelings, the mind and its qualities is counted four times over. Why does the body come first in your reading of the discourse?