Freed by Wisdom Alone
Monks who claim final liberation without the deep absorptions force a hard question about the path. Whether seeing clearly is enough, or calm must come first, still divides Theravāda teachers.
Buddhaghosa's gloss is short and has had a long life: the monks who told Susīma they were liberated by wisdom were without the absorptions and reached the goal by insight alone. He adds that the Buddha mentioned them to show that the newcomer was not the only one. The same commentary is alert to false arrivals. It reads Ānanda's caution with Susīma as a judgement of motive, and Vakkali's story as a monk mistaking passions held quiet for passions gone, until pain showed him the difference.
- insight
- insight meditation
- concentration
- meditation
- arahantship
- liberation
- wisdom
- nibbana
Enter a dialogue
- Monks tell Susīma, a newcomer, they are fully liberated yet have no psychic powers or formless meditations. How can anyone be free without them?
- If insight alone can free someone, as your reading of Susīma's monks allows, why does the path spend so much effort on the deep absorptions?
- Ānanda brings Susīma to the Buddha instead of ordaining him himself, unsure what the newcomer really wants. Why should a teaching be careful about who seeks it?
- Susīma's old sect sends him to learn the Buddha's verses so they can use them to win supporters. Why does the teaching free him instead?
- Vakkali takes the quiet of his passions for final freedom until illness and pain show him otherwise. How can anyone tell passions held down from passions gone?