A Map of the Feelings
What separates the feeling that charms us from the feeling that awes us — and can such a sorting of temperaments, sexes and whole peoples survive once the observer's own prejudices are counted in?
Feeling sorts into two families, the young Kant proposes — the sublime that moves us and the beautiful that charms — and the observation runs outward from there to temperament, to the sexes, to the character of nations. It is the essayist's method, closer to Shaftesbury and Burke than to any system, and it won him a wide readership. The fourth section is why the book is still argued over: ranking non-European peoples and women by aesthetic character, it left sentences his modern readers set at the very centre of the dispute over Kant and race.
- aesthetics
- beauty
- moral psychology
- sublime
- gender
- national character
- religion
Enter a dialogue
- A friend of mine weeps at a ruined abbey yet yawns in a rose garden — what does that split tell you about her?
- Someone plain and dutiful moves me more than someone brilliant — does your book give me warrant to prize her so?
- You sort whole nations and races by their feeling for beauty — how is that not the observer's own prejudice dressed as a finding?
- Holding beauty and sublimity apart as two families, what pleasure must a lover of art stop hoping to feel at once?
- What keeps the sublime that awes a person apart from the beautiful that merely charms them?