Get started

WorkImmanuel Kant

Critique of Judgement

Kant's third Critique (1790), built to bridge nature and freedom out of two puzzles — why we argue about beauty, and why living things look designed.

by Immanuel Kant472 passages held

  • English, a translation held here, and your language
Sign in or subscribe to discuss this work See it in context
Original language
German

Report a rights issue

Overview

No book did more to shape what came after Kant, and he wrote it to close a gap in his own system. The first Critique had left nature governed by mechanical necessity; the second had left the will free — and between the realm of what is and the realm of what ought to be there was, Kant worried, no bridge. This third Critique, published in 1790, is that bridge, and it builds it out of two unlikely materials: our judgments of beauty and our sense that living things are made for something. When we call a thing beautiful, Kant argues, we make a strange kind of claim — we expect everyone to agree, yet we are reporting a pleasure and not a fact about the object, a pleasure taken in pure form with no interest in whether the thing exists or what it is good for. He calls it purposiveness without a purpose. The second half turns to organisms, which we cannot help seeing as wholes whose parts exist for each other, and asks how far natural science may lean on that appearance of design without mistaking it for knowledge. The book's afterlife came to dwarf the reception of its argument: Schiller took it for a theory of freedom through beauty, the Romantics took it for a charter, and Hegel and Schelling built German Idealism partly on its back. Modern aesthetics still starts here.

Key concepts

What's the difference between reflective and determinant judgment?

Determinant judgment applies a rule already given to a particular case. Reflective judgment has no rule to hand and must search out the universal for a given particular. Both our judgments of beauty and our sense of purpose in living things call for the reflective kind — which is why this third Critique is, at bottom, a critique of reflective judgment.

What does Kant mean by 'disinterested' pleasure in beauty?

A pleasure that takes no interest in whether the object exists or what it is good for. You are not judging its usefulness, its moral rightness, or your desire to possess it — only its form as it presents itself to you. This disinterest is exactly what marks the beautiful off from the merely agreeable and from the good.

What is the 'sensus communis' Kant appeals to?

Not ordinary good sense, but a shared capacity to feel that a judgment of taste presupposes — the ground on which you demand everyone's agreement to what is only your own pleasure. When you call a thing beautiful you speak, Kant says, with a 'universal voice,' as if the feeling ought to be shared, though you can never prove it should.

What is a 'natural purpose,' or organized being?

A natural purpose is a thing in which the parts are reciprocally cause and effect of each other, each existing for and by means of the whole — in short, an organism. We cannot make sense of it by mechanism alone, so we are driven to judge it as if it were designed, while never being entitled to call that design a fact.

What does Kant mean by 'genius'?

Genius is the inborn talent through which nature gives the rule to art. It produces beautiful art without following any rule it could state, since no rule for beauty can be handed over or learned; instead it makes the exemplary work that others take their bearings from. Genius is thus original and exemplary at once, and cannot explain how it does what it does.

What does 'purposiveness without a purpose' mean?

In a judgment of beauty the object strikes us as though it were made to suit our cognition — its form fits our faculties as if by design — yet we assign it no actual purpose or use. It looks purposive while serving no purpose. That felt harmony between the object's form and our own powers is the very ground of the pleasure we take.

Themes of the book

What this book returns to, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of the text each one occupies.

Beauty and the Judgment of Taste

When we call a thing beautiful we expect everyone to agree, yet we are reporting a pleasure and not a fact about the object — what strange kind of claim is that?

A judgement of taste demands universal assent while resting on a felt pleasure, one taken in pure form with no interest in whether the thing exists or what it is good for — purposiveness without a purpose. Kant makes the paradox the centre of aesthetics: beauty is neither a property of objects nor a private whim but the free play of imagination and understanding, valid for everyone though grounded in feeling. The sublime extends the account to what overwhelms the senses and throws us back on reason. Modern aesthetics still starts here.

  • aesthetics
  • taste
  • sublime
  • subjectivity
  • judgment
  • imagination
  • creativity

Enter a dialogue

The Purposiveness of Nature

We cannot help seeing a living thing as a whole whose parts exist for each other — but how far may science lean on that look of design without mistaking it for knowledge?

Organisms force a way of seeing that mechanical causation cannot supply: we grasp them as wholes whose parts are reciprocally means and ends, as if made for something. Kant asks how far natural science may use that appearance of purpose as a guide without claiming to have found real design in nature — a regulative maxim for judgement, never a fact about the world. It is teleology kept honest, granting the pull of the argument from design while denying it the standing of proof, and it shaped every later debate about biology and purpose.

  • teleology
  • nature
  • causality
  • cognition
  • theology
  • reason

Enter a dialogue

The Bridge Between Nature and Freedom

The first Critique left nature ruled by necessity, the second left the will free — so what spans the gulf between what is and what ought to be?

Kant built the third Critique to close a gap in his own system: between mechanical nature and moral freedom there was no passage, and judgement — our sense of beauty and of purpose — is made to supply one. Beauty becomes a symbol of the morally good; the purposiveness we read into nature makes it hospitable to the ends reason sets. Schiller took the book for a theory of freedom through beauty, the Romantics for a charter, and Hegel and Schelling built German Idealism partly on its back — an afterlife that came to dwarf the argument itself.

  • freedom
  • morality
  • reason
  • autonomy
  • ethics

Enter a dialogue

Within this work

passages held
472
distinct concepts
346
by passages held, corpus-wide
#73

What this book thinks together

Every arc around the wheel is one concept in this book. A ribbon joins two the text reaches for together, and its width is how many of its passages hold both. Strongest: aesthetics with subjectivity.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 8 concepts, joined by 26 pairings. 751 shared passages in all. 74 weaker pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
aestheticssubjectivity83
natureteleology74
aestheticsjudgment71
aestheticsperception61
aestheticscognition46
judgmentsubjectivity44
cognitionsubjectivity40
reasonteleology33
perceptionsubjectivity32
cognitionjudgment26
cognitionteleology26
aestheticsnature23
cognitionperception21
cognitionnature19
aestheticsreason18
judgmentperception16
subjectivityteleology16
naturereason15
aestheticsteleology14
natureperception14
perceptionteleology13
reasonsubjectivity11
naturesubjectivity10
cognitionreason9
judgmentnature8
judgmentteleology8

Works held

The author's work in order, this book marked in place. Your-language title first, the original beneath it where the two differ; side chips show which full texts are held.

  1. 1764 Inquiry Concerning the Distinctness of the Principles of Natural Theology and Morality (Untersuchung über die Deutlichkeit der Grundsätze der natürlichen Theologie und der Moral)

    Kant's runner-up entry in the Berlin Academy's prize contest, and the sharpest of the pre-critical essays: it already sets philosophy's method against mathematics', the problem the first Critique would finally resolve.

     DE
  2. 1764 Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime (Beobachtungen über das Gefühl des Schönen und Erhabenen)

    The popular essay of Kant's pre-critical years, twenty-six years before the Critique of Judgement gave taste a rigorous grounding; its remarks on race and sex now drive much of the scholarship on him.

     DE
  3. 1766 Dreams of a Spirit-Seer, Elucidated by Dreams of Metaphysics (Träume eines Geistersehers, erläutert durch Träume der Metaphysik)

    The anonymous, ironic book of 1766 in which Kant's faith in speculative metaphysics visibly collapses — the clearing of the ground that the first Critique, fifteen years later, would build on.

     DE
  4. 1781 The Critique of Pure Reason (Kritik der reinen Vernunft)

    The book at the centre of everything after it: the first of the three Critiques, revised almost past recognition for its 1787 second edition, and the work the Prolegomena was written to explain.

     DEEN
  5. 1784 An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment? (Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?)

    The most quoted thing Kant wrote, and among the shortest: a 1784 magazine answer to a question a Berlin pastor had left hanging, and the defining slogan of the German Enlightenment.

     DE
  6. 1784 Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose (Idee zu einer allgemeinen Geschichte in weltbürgerlicher Absicht)

    The essay where Kant first treats history as more than chronicle — nine propositions arguing it has a hidden rational shape; the seed of Perpetual Peace, and a device Hegel later took over.

     DE
  7. 1785 Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals (Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten)

    The short, deliberately preliminary book that isolates the categorical imperative before building anything on it; three years later the Critique of Practical Reason would give the same moral law its fuller grounding.

     DEEN
  8. 1786 What Does It Mean to Orient Oneself in Thinking? (Was heißt: sich im Denken orientieren?)

    An intervention in the pantheism controversy that split the German Enlightenment: written months after Mendelssohn's death, it stakes out a rational faith between dogmatic proof and Jacobi's leap.

     DE
  9. 1788 The Critique of Practical Reason (Kritik der praktischen Vernunft)

    The second of the three Critiques, and Kant's reply to those who doubted the Groundwork's freedom; it introduces the fact of reason and the postulates of God and immortality.

     DEEN
  10. 1793 Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason (Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft)

    The book that got Kant ordered to stop writing on religion: four essays, from 1793, rebuilding Christian doctrine on reason and consigning revelation and clergy to what Kant called counterfeit service.

     DE
  11. 1795 Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch (Zum ewigen Frieden: Ein philosophischer Entwurf)

    The late essay whose plan for a league of free states reached the twentieth century intact; Kant, past seventy, wrote it as Prussia pulled out of the war against revolutionary France.

     DE
  12. 1797 Einleitung in die Rechtslehre

    The framing section of the Doctrine of Right, the legal half of Kant's 1797 Metaphysics of Morals; it defines a right through freedom alone and ties every right to a power to coerce.

     DE
  13. 1798 Von der Macht des Gemüts, durch den bloßen Vorsatz seiner krankhaften Gefühle Meister zu sein

    The third part of Kant's late Conflict of the Faculties (1798), written as a reply to the physician Hufeland — a philosopher's dietetics, and his most personal page on governing the body through the mind.

     DE
  14. 1803 Lectures on Pedagogy (Über Pädagogik)

    One of the last books to appear under Kant's name (1803), though his editor Rink built it from lecture notes; the fullest record of Kant on education, and of his debt to Rousseau.

     DE
  15. Critique of Judgement you are here DEEN
  16. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics

    Written to salvage the Critique of Pure Reason after its baffled reception, this shorter 1783 restatement runs the same argument in reverse, and became most readers' first encounter with Kant.

     DEEN
  17. The Metaphysical Elements of Ethics (Die Metaphysik der Sitten)

    Long read as a mere appendix to the Groundwork, this ethical half of the 1797 Metaphysics of Morals is where Kant spells out the duties of virtue; later Kantians recovered it as his theory of character.

     DEEN
Sign in or subscribe to discuss this work

— or open another of their works