WorkImmanuel Kant

An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment?

Kant's few-page reply, in 1784, to a clergyman's stray question — the essay that made *sapere aude*, dare to know, the motto of the Enlightenment.

by Immanuel Kant17 passages held

German, the original language

Original title: Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?
First published: 1784(aged 60)
Original language: German

Report a rights issue

Overview

A Berlin clergyman named Johann Friedrich Zöllner dropped the question into a footnote. Arguing in print against civil marriage, he complained that nobody had ever settled what "enlightenment" actually meant, and that the word was being thrown around to unsettle people's consciences. Kant took the bait. His answer, printed in the Berlinische Monatsschrift in December 1784, is a few pages long and has outlived almost everything around it. Enlightenment, he writes, is a person's release from a tutelage they imposed on themselves — the habit of letting a book, a pastor or a doctor think in their place — and its motto is two words of Horace, sapere aude, dare to know. The nerve of the essay is a distinction that lets it be radical and prudent at once: the public use of reason, a scholar writing for the reading world, must be free without limit, while the private use, the same person carrying out an office, may be bound. So a pastor must teach his church's doctrine and may still publish his doubts about it. Kant was not first to the question — Mendelssohn had answered it in the same journal three months before, and the two later noted they had written in ignorance of each other — but it is Kant's version that became the slogan of an age, quoted ever since as the shortest statement of what the Enlightenment took itself to be.

Key concepts

What is the 'self-imposed tutelage' Kant says we must leave?

Tutelage (Unmuendigkeit) is the inability to use your own understanding without another's guidance. Kant calls it self-imposed when its source is not a lack of intellect but a lack of resolve — the settled habit of letting a book, a pastor or a doctor think in your place. Enlightenment is a person's release from precisely that condition.

What does 'sapere aude' mean, and why does Kant use it?

Sapere aude is two words of Horace, 'dare to know.' Kant makes it enlightenment's motto: have the courage to use your own understanding instead of leaning on someone else to do your thinking. The whole few-page essay is an unfolding of that imperative, and the phrase became the shortest statement of what the Enlightenment took itself to be.

What is the difference between the public and private use of reason?

The public use is a scholar addressing the whole reading world, and Kant says it must be free without any limit. The private use is a person carrying out a particular office or post, and it may be bound. The words run against intuition: the pastor in print is 'public,' the same pastor in his pulpit is 'private.'

Does Kant call his own century an enlightened age?

No — he draws a careful line: this is not an enlightened age but an age of enlightenment. The process is underway, not complete, and it advances only under a ruler who allows freedom of the pen. Kant credits Frederick's Prussia with that freedom while making clear the work of maturity is far from finished.

Themes of the book

What this book returns to, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of the text each one occupies.

Dare to Know

What keeps a grown person from thinking for themselves — and how can a subject be radically free in print yet still bound in the office they hold?

Enlightenment is release from a tutelage one imposed on oneself: the habit of letting a book, a pastor or a doctor think in one's place, broken by the nerve to use one's own understanding — sapere aude. The essay's hinge is a distinction that lets it be bold and prudent at once: the public use of reason, a scholar addressing the reading world, must be free without limit, while the private use, the same person executing an office, may be bound. So a pastor teaches his church's doctrine and may still publish his doubts about it. Those few pages became the age's slogan.

autonomy
intellectual freedom
public reason
courage
conscience
enlightenment
freedom of expression
obedience
political authority
religion
religious freedom

Enter a dialogue

Within this work

passages held: 17
distinct concepts: 45
by passages held, corpus-wide: #791

What this book thinks together

The wheel takes this book’s leading concepts and shows how often they come up together. The wider the band between two, the more of its passages speak of both. Among them, most often together: “autonomy” and “enlightenment”.

Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 4 concepts, joined by 5 pairings. 17 pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
Concept	Paired concept	Shared passages
autonomy	enlightenment	5
freedom of expression	public reason	5
enlightenment	public reason	3
enlightenment	freedom of expression	2
autonomy	public reason	1

Works held

The author's work in order, this book marked in place. Your-language title first, the original beneath it where the two differ; side chips show which full texts are held.

1764 Inquiry Concerning the Distinctness of the Principles of Natural Theology and Morality (Untersuchung über die Deutlichkeit der Grundsätze der natürlichen Theologie und der Moral)
Kant's runner-up entry in the Berlin Academy's prize contest, and the sharpest of the pre-critical essays: it already sets philosophy's method against mathematics', the problem the first Critique would finally resolve.
DE
1764 Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime (Beobachtungen über das Gefühl des Schönen und Erhabenen)
The popular essay of Kant's pre-critical years, twenty-six years before the Critique of Judgement gave taste a rigorous grounding; its remarks on race and sex now drive much of the scholarship on him.
DE
1766 Dreams of a Spirit-Seer, Elucidated by Dreams of Metaphysics (Träume eines Geistersehers, erläutert durch Träume der Metaphysik)
The anonymous, ironic book of 1766 in which Kant's faith in speculative metaphysics visibly collapses — the clearing of the ground that the first Critique, fifteen years later, would build on.
DE
1781 The Critique of Pure Reason (Kritik der reinen Vernunft)
The book at the centre of everything after it: the first of the three Critiques, revised almost past recognition for its 1787 second edition, and the work the Prolegomena was written to explain.
DEEN
1783 Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics
Written to salvage the Critique of Pure Reason after its baffled reception, this shorter 1783 restatement runs the same argument in reverse, and became most readers' first encounter with Kant.
DEEN
1784 An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment? (Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?) you are here DE
1784 Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose (Idee zu einer allgemeinen Geschichte in weltbürgerlicher Absicht)
The essay where Kant first treats history as more than chronicle — nine propositions arguing it has a hidden rational shape; the seed of Perpetual Peace, and a device Hegel later took over.
DE
1785 Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals (Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten)
The short, deliberately preliminary book that isolates the categorical imperative before building anything on it; three years later the Critique of Practical Reason would give the same moral law its fuller grounding.
DEEN
1786 What Does It Mean to Orient Oneself in Thinking? (Was heißt: sich im Denken orientieren?)
An intervention in the pantheism controversy that split the German Enlightenment: written months after Mendelssohn's death, it stakes out a rational faith between dogmatic proof and Jacobi's leap.
DE
1788 The Critique of Practical Reason (Kritik der praktischen Vernunft)
The second of the three Critiques, and Kant's reply to those who doubted the Groundwork's freedom; it introduces the fact of reason and the postulates of God and immortality.
DEEN
1790 Critique of Judgement
The book the Romantics and the German Idealists built on: Kant's 1790 account of beauty and of purpose in nature, written to bridge the gulf that had opened between his first two Critiques.
DEEN
1793 Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason (Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft)
The book that got Kant ordered to stop writing on religion: four essays, from 1793, rebuilding Christian doctrine on reason and consigning revelation and clergy to what Kant called counterfeit service.
DE
1795 Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch (Zum ewigen Frieden: Ein philosophischer Entwurf)
The late essay whose plan for a league of free states reached the twentieth century intact; Kant, past seventy, wrote it as Prussia pulled out of the war against revolutionary France.
DE
1797 Introduction to the Doctrine of Right (Einleitung in die Rechtslehre)
The framing section of the Doctrine of Right, the legal half of Kant's 1797 Metaphysics of Morals; it defines a right through freedom alone and ties every right to a power to coerce.
DE
1797 The Metaphysical Elements of Ethics (Die Metaphysik der Sitten)
Long read as a mere appendix to the Groundwork, this ethical half of the 1797 Metaphysics of Morals is where Kant spells out the duties of virtue; later Kantians recovered it as his theory of character.
DEEN
1798 On the Power of the Mind to Master Its Morbid Feelings by Sheer Resolution (Von der Macht des Gemüts, durch den bloßen Vorsatz seiner krankhaften Gefühle Meister zu sein)
The third part of Kant's late Conflict of the Faculties (1798), written as a reply to the physician Hufeland — a philosopher's dietetics, and his most personal page on governing the body through the mind.
DE
1803 Lectures on Pedagogy (Über Pädagogik)
One of the last books to appear under Kant's name (1803), though his editor Rink built it from lecture notes; the fullest record of Kant on education, and of his debt to Rousseau.
DE

— or open another of their works