The Hidden Plan of History
Up close, human history is war and vanity that add up to nothing — so what if, from far enough back, it is driving the species somewhere it never meant to go?
Nature has a plan the actors never signed, Kant wagers across nine numbered propositions, and its engine is humanity's unsocial sociability: people can neither bear one another nor do without one another, and that friction forces them to develop their powers, build laws, and at last submit to a just constitution. War itself is a goad, driving the species over generations toward a lawful federation where the antagonism has nowhere left to go. He claims not a proof but a thread a philosophical historian might follow — the device Hegel would rebuild as the cunning of reason.
- teleology
- nature
- freedom
- autonomy
- philosophy of history
- human development
Enter a dialogue
- You describe history as woven from folly, childish vanity and destructiveness. Why does that grim picture lead you to look for a hidden purpose rather than despair?
- Everyone chooses whether to marry, yet yearly tables of marriages, births and deaths follow steady patterns. Why does that make you hope free actions have a course?
- Nature gave humans no bull's horns, lion's claws or dog's teeth, only hands. Why do you read that as nature wanting people to earn even their goodness?
- You admit that a history written by an idea of how the world should go sounds like a novel. What makes your thread more than comforting fiction?
- A person needs a master to curb his selfishness, but that master is a human who needs one too. How could history ever produce a just ruler?