The Duties of Virtue
The Groundwork gave a formula and, critics said, no ethics — so where does the categorical imperative finally get spent on the concrete matter of a good life?
Twelve years after stating the imperative in the abstract, Kant spends it. The Doctrine of Right had covered the duties a state can enforce; virtue covers the ones it cannot, organised around two ends reason makes obligatory — one's own perfection and the happiness of others. From these he works out matter the Groundwork never touched: duties against lying, servility and self-contempt, duties of beneficence, gratitude and respect. His casuistical questions pointedly refuse a rule for every case, and later Kantians recovered the book as proof his ethics was always more than its single most quoted principle.
- ethics
- duty
- virtue
- virtue ethics
- moral obligation
- freedom
- moral motivation
- practical reason
Enter a dialogue
- A court can make someone pay a debt, but nothing can make them adopt another person's good as their goal. Why does ethics begin there?
- The duty to help others fixes no amount and may give way to another duty, such as care for parents. Doesn't that let everyone off?
- Someone who makes meat or fish, beer or wine a moral question strews every step with duties like traps. Why would that turn virtue into tyranny?
- Nobody needs telling to seek their own happiness, and no one can make another good. Why does duty aim instead at one's own perfection and others' happiness?
- Aristotle put every virtue midway between two vices, thrift between waste and miserliness. Why can no one reach a virtue by dialling a vice up or down?