A Map of the Feelings
What separates the feeling that charms us from the feeling that awes us — and can such a sorting of temperaments, sexes and whole peoples survive once the observer's own prejudices are counted in?
Feeling sorts into two families, the young Kant proposes — the sublime that moves us and the beautiful that charms — and the observation runs outward from there to temperament, to the sexes, to the character of nations. It is the essayist's method, closer to Shaftesbury and Burke than to any system, and it won him a wide readership. The fourth section is why the book is still argued over: ranking non-European peoples and women by aesthetic character, it left sentences his modern readers set at the very centre of the dispute over Kant and race.
- aesthetics
- beauty
- moral psychology
- sublime
- gender
- national character
- religion
Enter a dialogue
- You sort whole nations and races by their feeling for beauty — how is that not the observer's own prejudice dressed as a finding?
- A friend is hushed by tall oaks in a dark grove but bored by clipped hedges and flowerbeds. What does that say about her temperament?
- A miser who shut his heart to everyone dreams he is driven past the last star, alone forever. Why is that horror noble rather than merely dreadful?
- A tender heart weeps over one suffering child yet hears of a great battle coldly. Why do you call such warm pity lovable but not yet virtue?
- Alcest loves his wife because she is beautiful and clever, Adrast treats his kindly because she is his wife. Whose regard survives her age and illness?