The Propensity to Evil
If a human being is born neither innocent nor merely weak but bent toward evil, and freely so, how can the same freedom ever turn a person good?
Evil is not inherited guilt and not mere frailty but a propensity, freely adopted and radical because it corrupts the ground of all our choices, so that even our good deeds are shot through with self-love. Yet because the corruption is freely taken on, in freedom it can be reversed: redemption is the moral labour of becoming a new man, not a gift descending from outside. Kant sets the whole drama within the will's own causality, refusing both the theologian's inherited original sin and the optimist's easy confidence in human nature.
- freedom
- will
- causality
- moral law
- autonomy
- morality
- moral responsibility
Enter a dialogue
- Alone, a person's needs stay small and calm. Why do envy, greed and the lust to rule wake up only once other people are around?
- What is inborn was not chosen, yet you call our bent to evil both inborn and our own fault. How can both be true?
- Someone notices that even their kindest acts are mixed with wanting thanks or praise. Does anything in your account offer a real road to becoming better?
- An apostle laments that he wills the good but cannot do it. Why is such weakness only the first of three steps in our bent to evil?
- A man who overindulges turns moderate for his health, a liar truthful for his honour. Why has such a person changed habits but not his heart?