The Propensity to Evil
If a human being is born neither innocent nor merely weak but bent toward evil, and freely so, how can the same freedom ever turn a person good?
Evil is not inherited guilt and not mere frailty but a propensity, freely adopted and radical because it corrupts the ground of all our choices, so that even our good deeds are shot through with self-love. Yet because the corruption is freely taken on, in freedom it can be reversed: redemption is the moral labour of becoming a new man, not a gift descending from outside. Kant sets the whole drama within the will's own causality, refusing both the theologian's inherited original sin and the optimist's easy confidence in human nature.
- freedom
- will
- causality
- moral law
- autonomy
- morality
- moral responsibility
Enter a dialogue
- You say we freely adopt a propensity to evil that corrupts every choice — if it is truly radical, how does the same will climb out?
- I catch self-love threaded even through my good deeds — does your book leave me any real road to becoming better?
- Refusing both inherited sin and easy confidence in human nature, what excuses for one's own wrongdoing must a person surrender?
- What sets your radical evil apart from the theologian's inherited original sin?