Finding Your Bearings in the Dark
When thought reaches past everything experience can show it — God, the soul, the supersensible — what saves it from either false proof or a blind leap into faith?
Thinking about what lies beyond all experience is like finding one's way in the dark: the road cannot be seen, but an inner feeling of which way is right — a need of reason that points without proving — lets one orient. Written into the pantheism quarrel that outlived Mendelssohn, the image refuses both sides: neither Jacobi's surrender of reason to a leap of faith nor the dogmatist's counterfeit proofs, but reason keeping faith with itself where knowledge stops. It is where Kant's idea of a purely rational faith gets its sharpest short statement.
- reason
- faith
- epistemology
- metaphysics
- autonomy
- freedom
- truth
- orientation
- rational faith
Enter a dialogue
- My thoughts reach past anything I can experience toward God and the soul — what saves me from either false proof or a blind leap?
- You call an inner feeling a need of reason that points without proving — how is that not just faith wearing reason's coat?
- Orienting oneself where knowledge stops, what certainties must a person give up on both the dogmatist's side and Jacobi's?
- How does your rational faith differ from Jacobi's surrender of reason to a leap of faith?
- Lost between proofs I distrust and a faith I cannot verify, which way does your inner compass tell a person to turn?