What Happens to a Person in a Crowd
Why does someone in a crowd think and feel what they never would alone? Freud accepts the old descriptions and asks the question they leave open.
Le Bon and McDougall agree that a crowd lowers intelligence and heightens emotion, and that its members catch feelings from one another as if hypnotised. Freud quotes them at length, then objects that 'suggestion', the word everyone uses, is itself never explained. Crowds can also create, as language and folk song show, and an organised group behaves differently from a mob. Against Trotter's herd instinct he proposes that humans are horde animals, needing not only one another but a single chief, whose loss sets off panic.
- crowd psychology
- mass psychology
- group psychology
- collective psychology
- suggestion
- social influence
- individuality
- emotion
- hypnosis
Enter a dialogue
- Le Bon describes a person in a crowd as losing judgement and becoming suggestible, as if hypnotised. What, in your view, does he never explain?
- In a parody of Judith and Holofernes a soldier cries that the general has lost his head, and the army flees. Why does losing a leader cause panic?
- Everyone explains crowds by "suggestion". Why do you refuse to accept a word that explains everything but is never explained itself?
- Trotter called humans herd animals. Why do you correct him, saying we are horde animals, each one led by a single chief?
- Crowds are usually called dull and impulsive, yet language, folk song and folklore are their work. How can a crowd be both?