Anxiety as a Warning
Does repression cause anxiety, or anxiety cause repression? Freud reverses the answer he had given for decades and says so in plain words.
Freud had long explained anxiety as dammed-up sexual excitement turned into fear. Re-reading his own cases, above all the boy who would not go into the street for fear of horses, he finds that the fear came first: the horse stood for the father, and the danger was castration. Anxiety now becomes a signal the ego gives itself when it senses danger, and that signal sets defence and repression going. When the signal fails, anxiety floods the person instead of warning them.
- anxiety
- signal anxiety
- danger
- repression
- ego
- defense mechanisms
- affect
- psychoanalytic theory
- phobia
Enter a dialogue
- For years you held that repression produces anxiety. Why did you come to say the reverse, that anxiety sets repression going?
- A little boy refused to go into the street for fear a horse would bite him. Why did you conclude that the horse stood for his father?
- Anxiety, you argue, is a small dose of fear the ego gives itself as a warning. What is it warning against, before any danger can be seen?
- A wanderer who sings in the dark, you write, denies his fear but sees no better for it. Is any grand theory of anxiety more than such singing?
- If anxiety is only a warning signal, why does it so often flood a person instead of quietly alerting them?