A Stimulus No One Can Flee
What exactly pushes us, from inside, to act? Freud tries to fix the basic concept of his theory and admits at the outset that it cannot yet be sharply defined.
A science, Freud insists, starts from description and lets its concepts sharpen later. The drive is his test case: a demand on the mind arising within the body, constant and inescapable, unlike an outside stimulus one can flee. Every drive has a pressure, an aim, which is always satisfaction, an object, and a source in the body. The object is the loosest bond of the four and can be exchanged. He divides the drives provisionally into self-preserving and sexual ones, and says so.
- drive theory
- definitions
- methodology
- scientific method
- biology
- nervous system
- satisfaction
- self-preservation
Enter a dialogue
- A person can shut their eyes against a glaring light, but nobody can run away from hunger. Why can no flight escape a drive?
- Critics demand that a science start from sharp definitions. Why do you begin instead with concepts you admit are vague, almost conventions?
- A drive, you say, lies on the frontier between mind and body. What does it mean for something to be neither simply physical nor simply mental?
- Someone moves from one passion to the next, a person, a cause, a hobby, always with the same fierce intensity. What stays constant underneath?
- You split the drives into those that preserve the self and the sexual ones, while calling the split provisional. Why build on a division you yourself doubt?