Read in Place, the Prophecies Speak of Judah
Do the Old Testament passages the Gospels quote really foretell Jesus? Read back in their own chapters, Paine argues, each one concerns the Jewish nation of its own time.
Paine takes every Gospel passage that quotes the Old Testament as a prophecy of Jesus and sets it back in the chapter it came from. Isaiah's sign of a child to be born, which Matthew reads as the virgin birth, was offered to Ahaz, king of Judah, as a pledge that the two kings then marching on Jerusalem would fail, and a sign has to come before the thing it signals, not seven hundred years after it. The conclusion is blunt: the New Testament rests its authority on these prophecies, so if there are none, the faith built on them has no ground.
- prophecy
- biblical interpretation
- scriptural criticism
- biblical criticism
- hermeneutics
- historical context
- scriptural context
- scriptural interpretation
- religious authority
- revelation
- divine revelation
- evidence
- miracles
Enter a dialogue
- Matthew reads Isaiah's 'a virgin shall conceive' as the virgin birth. Why do you say translators falsified the original, 'a young woman is with child'?
- What happens to a believer's faith when a verse they took as a promise turns out to have meant something else?
- Matthew applies 'I called my son out of Egypt' to Jesus, but in Hosea the son is Israel, who then served idols. Why does that sink the claim?
- Isn't reading every prophecy strictly inside its own chapter a rule chosen to reach your conclusion?
- A ruler from Bethlehem, in Micah, is to deliver Israel from the Assyrians. Why does Rome's rule over Judea show he cannot be Jesus?