Political writerUnited States

Thomas Paine

The staymaker who asked every power who gave it the right

10 works · 1,144 passages grounded

Lifespan
1737–1809
School
Radicalism
Wikipedia

The mind

In 1772 an excise officer in Lewes, a market town in Sussex, wrote a pamphlet for Parliament arguing that his colleagues were paid so little that poverty pushed honest men into taking bribes. The petition it supported was rejected, and in 1774 the excise service dismissed its author, Thomas Paine, then thirty-seven: a former staymaker who had left school in his early teens and had no patron and no money. Benjamin Franklin, who was in London lobbying for the colonies, gave him a letter of introduction, and on 30 November 1774 Paine landed in Philadelphia, ill with a fever caught on the voyage.

Everything he wrote after that puts one question to whatever power he found in front of him: who gave it the right? His answer, first given in Common Sense in January 1776 and never withdrawn, was that nobody inherits authority over anybody else. A people that chooses a good king, he argued, has no right to hand its grandchildren to that king's descendants. Turned on Parliament, the same test said that no generation can bind the next. Turned on the churches, it said that a revelation is only hearsay for everyone except the person who first received it. Turned on land, it said that the earth once belonged to everyone, so whoever holds a piece of it owes the rest a rent.

Few of these principles were original to Paine. He often echoes John Locke, the English philosopher of natural rights, though he claimed never to have read him. His contribution was to put the principles before a mass audience. Common Sense told colonists who were still petitioning the king that the time for petitions was over. It sold somewhere between 75,000 and 120,000 copies — the figure is argued over — in colonies of about two and a half million people, and it was often read aloud.

In Rights of Man he carried the argument home to Britain. The book answered Edmund Burke, the Whig politician who had defended inherited institutions against the French Revolution, and its Part II, published in 1792, added a costed plan: spend less on government, and use the savings to pay pensions from the age of fifty and to school poor children. In December 1792 a London jury convicted Paine of seditious libel in his absence. By then France had made him an honorary citizen, and he sat in the National Convention in Paris.

In Paris he applied the same principles to the Revolution itself. In January 1793 he asked the Convention to spare Louis XVI, banish him to America and abolish the death penalty, and the plea earned him the enmity of the Jacobins. When the Convention expelled its foreign members in December, Paine was arrested as a foreigner and spent ten months in the Luxembourg prison. He was freed after James Monroe, the new American minister in Paris, claimed him as a citizen of the United States.

Back in his seat in 1795, he argued that the vote belongs to every man, whether or not he owns property; no one rose to speak for him. Two years later Agrarian Justice proposed a national fund paying every person £15 at twenty-one and £10 a year after fifty, as a right and not as charity. His welfare proposals probably did little to shape the modern welfare state, but advocates of a basic income now trace their idea back to this pamphlet.

The Age of Reason did more than anything else to wreck his standing in America. He wrote it to defend belief in one God against every church that claimed to speak for him. Paine returned to America in 1802 to find former allies turned against him, and in 1806 an election inspector at New Rochelle refused his vote on the ground that he was not an American. He died in Greenwich Village on 8 June 1809. The Quakers refused him a place in their burial ground, and he was buried on his farm at New Rochelle with only a handful of mourners present.

Key concepts

Why does Paine reject every kind of inherited authority?

Because authority, for Paine, exists only by the consent of the people it governs, and nobody can consent on someone else's behalf. A people may choose a ruler for itself, but it has no right to choose for its grandchildren. The same reasoning refuses hereditary crowns, hereditary titles and any generation's claim to bind the next: each is a decision made for people who were never asked.

What is the difference between society and government, for Paine?

Society grows out of people's needs and is a blessing; government is at best a necessary evil. Society comes first and does most of the work of living together, so government is to be judged by what it adds and kept close to the people it serves. Measured that way, a king adds nothing but cost and danger.

Why must rights be equal, on Paine's account?

Because rights come to a person simply from existing, and everyone exists equally. Paine grounds them in nature rather than in birth, property or charter, so nothing a person owns can add to them. That is why he held that the vote cannot be reserved to property owners: making property the measure turns a right into a purchase and makes a man the servant of his possessions.

What kind of God does Paine believe in?

One God, the Creator, known through the order of the world rather than through any book. Paine held that the universe is the one word of God that people could not have written, and that true religion is belief in that God together with acting justly and mercifully. He rejected revelation and priesthoods, argued against atheism as well, and hoped for happiness after death.

Why does Paine pay his fund to rich and poor alike?

Because the payment is a share of an inheritance, not relief for need. Paine held that the earth was once everyone's common property and that each landholder owes the rest a ground-rent for the portion he took over. A debt is owed to every creditor, rich or poor, so paying everyone makes it a right; paying only the needy would turn it back into charity.

What does Paine mean by common sense?

The judgment any person can bring to a public question without rank, learning or office behind them. Paine held that the truths that matter most in politics and religion are plain enough for ordinary reasoning, so no court, trained class or clergy is needed to settle them for others. That is why he wrote in plain words, and why an argument's force, for him, never depended on who made it.

Themes of the Mind

Concepts that recur together across the corpus held here, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of this philosopher's writing each one occupies.

Nobody Inherits Authority Over Anybody

Who gave this power the right to command? Crown, peerage and church were all asked, and a claim that rested on descent was, for him, no answer at all.

The test was first put to George III in Common Sense: a people that chooses a good king has no right to hand its grandchildren to his descendants, so a hereditary crown wrongs the unborn however mild its wearer. Titles fared no better. The great English estates, he reminded the propertied in 1795, were seized at the Norman Conquest, and titles were the names their takers hid behind. What survives the test is authority by consent, renewed by the living, and nothing older may call itself a right.

  • political legitimacy
  • political authority
  • monarchy
  • aristocracy
  • popular sovereignty

Government Made by the Living

What must a people already have before it has a government at all? Rights and a constitution, on his account, which means no government can be the source of either.

Burke held that the Parliament of 1688 had bound the nation to its line of kings for all time. Rights of Man answered that the dead hold no authority over the living: rights belong to people by nature, and a constitution is the act of a people, made before a government exists and binding it afterwards. Representation carried the same logic to the ballot. In 1795 he told the Convention that the vote belongs to every man, propertied or not, because rights come from existing and not from possessions.

  • representative government
  • political representation
  • constitutionalism
  • natural rights
  • government

Revolution Without Vengeance

When may a people break with its rulers by force, and what does it still owe the ruler it has overthrown? He answered the first in America and paid for his answer to the second in France.

He argued the colonies into war in 1776 and stayed with the army through its retreat, writing that a cause is measured by who stays with it while it is losing. A revolution, for him, abolishes monarchy, not the monarch. In January 1793 he asked the Convention to banish Louis XVI rather than kill him, and to make France the first nation to abolish the death penalty, a punishment he said monarchies had taught their subjects. The plea failed and earned him the Jacobins' enmity; before the year was out he was a prisoner.

  • revolution
  • war
  • independence
  • political independence
  • military strategy
  • peace

One God, and No One Entitled to Speak for Him

Can anyone be bound by what God is said to have told someone else? He believed in God and answered no, and the answer cost him more than any of his political books.

The Age of Reason was written to defend belief in one God, known through the order of the world, together with a duty to act justly and mercifully. Its target was revelation: whatever the first hearer received, for everyone after him it is hearsay. The Bible then becomes a book to be read like others, open to questions of authorship and consistency. Moses could not have written of his own burial, and the prophecies the Gospels quote, read in place, speak of Judah. Against the atheists he turned the same reason, arguing that matter cannot set itself in motion.

  • biblical criticism
  • prophecy
  • biblical interpretation
  • authorship
  • religious authority
  • miracles
  • natural theology

The Public Purse and What the Poor Are Owed

Is help for the poor something the fortunate may give, or something they owe? From his first pamphlet to Agrarian Justice he treated it as a debt, and put a figure on it.

His first pamphlet, in 1772, argued that pay too low to live on pushed honest excise officers into taking bribes. The attention to money never left him. Rights of Man Part II costed a plan to cut the expense of the court and spend the savings on pensions from fifty and schooling for poor children. Agrarian Justice dug deeper. The earth was once everyone's common inheritance; farming makes private land necessary, but whoever holds it owes the rest a ground-rent, paid out as £15 at twenty-one and £10 a year after fifty, as a right.

  • taxation
  • public finance
  • political economy
  • justice

Plain Reasoning Put to Every Reader

Can ordinary people judge questions of state and scripture for themselves, with no trained class to do it for them? Everything he wrote was a wager that they can.

Few of his principles were new; he often echoes Locke. What he changed was who was addressed. Common Sense spoke in plain words to colonists still petitioning their king, and it was often read aloud. The Crisis papers argued with Americans and with Britain's own leaders in the same voice, and The Age of Reason put the Bible's authorship to ordinary readers rather than to the clergy. Beneath all of it lies one conviction: a sound argument needs no rank behind it, only a hearer willing to reason.

  • political rhetoric
  • political judgment
  • reason

By the numbers

works held
10
passages traced
1,144
concepts traced
1,247
thematic clusters
5

Concepts that travel together

The wheel takes the leading concepts of these writings and shows how often they come up together. The wider the band between two, the more passages speak of both. Among them, most often together: “monarchy” and “political legitimacy”.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 6 concepts, joined by 15 pairings. 91 pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
monarchypolitical legitimacy14
political legitimacyrevolution10
revolutiontaxation10
taxationwar10
political legitimacytaxation7
monarchyrepresentative government6
political legitimacyrepresentative government6
monarchyrevolution5
monarchytaxation5
representative governmentrevolution4
representative governmenttaxation3
revolutionwar3
monarchywar2
political legitimacywar2
representative governmentwar1

The arc of a career

A cell's weight is that concept's share of the work's passages, so a column can be read downwards as well as a row across. Densest: natural theology in The Existence of God, 58.3%.

Density 0% 58.3%

Concept density per work, chronological 10 works, in the order they were written. 8 concept columns, ranked by total weight. 86 further concepts fall outside the columns shown.
WorkYearrevolutionpolitical legitimacymonarchynatural theologyprophecywarrepresentative governmenttaxation
Common Sense1.4%21.9%21.9%0%0%4.1%4.1%1.4%
The American Crisis1.7%4.5%1%0%0.3%18.3%0.3%11.7%
Letter Addressed to the Abbé Raynal on the Affairs of North-America9.1%2.6%0%0%0%27.3%0%6.5%
Rights of Man16.5%12.7%8.9%0%0%4.4%5.7%18.1%
Reasons for Wishing to Preserve the Life of Louis Capet42.9%14.3%42.9%0%0%0%14.3%0%
The Age of Reason0.9%0%0%7.7%13.7%0.4%0%0%
Dissertation on First Principles of Government14.8%22.2%0%0%0%0%25.9%0%
Agrarian Justice3.6%3.6%3.6%0%0%0%3.6%14.3%
The Existence of God0%0%0%58.3%0%0%0%0%
Examination of the Prophecies1.2%0%0%2.4%53.7%0%0%0%

Works held

Titles in your language, the original beneath in brackets; “lit.” marks our own translation where no English edition exists. Side chips show which full texts are held.

AMERICA — COMMON SENSE AND THE CRISIS PAPERS

  1. 1776 Common Sense

    The book that made Paine's name, so much so that he signed the Crisis papers of the following years with its title.

    EN
  2. 1776 The American Crisis

    A serial rather than a book: papers issued one at a time between December 1776 and December 1783, whenever the war's news called for one, each under the title The Crisis.

    EN
  3. 1782 Letter Addressed to the Abbé Raynal on the Affairs of North-America (Letter to the Abbe Raynal)

    Ten months after the victory at Yorktown, with the war winding down, Paine set out to put the record of the Revolution straight for European readers.

    EN

BRITAIN — THE REPLY TO BURKE

  1. 1791 Rights of Man

    Paine's contribution to the pamphlet war that Burke's Reflections set off in Britain; the writer Mary Wollstonecraft had answered Burke first, in November 1790.

    EN

PARIS — THE CONVENTION AND THE LUXEMBOURG PRISON

  1. 1793 Reasons for Wishing to Preserve the Life of Louis Capet (Reasons for Preserving the Life of Louis Capet)

    Second of the three speeches Paine gave in the Convention on the king's fate: the first, in November 1792, argued that Louis should be tried; the last pleaded for a reprieve.

    EN
  2. 1794 The Age of Reason

    Between the two stretches in which it was written, Paine spent ten months in a Paris prison; it is his one sustained book on religion, and the one that cost him most.

    EN
  3. 1795 Dissertation on First Principles of Government

    Here Paine's political principles are condensed into a few dozen pages, in his last attempt to shape a French constitution from inside the Convention.

    EN

PARIS — THE AGE OF REASON AND AGRARIAN JUSTICE

  1. 1797 Agrarian Justice

    Published in answer to a bishop's sermon on rich and poor, it carries the welfare proposals of Rights of Man to a principle: that the landless are owed a share of the earth.

    EN
  2. 1797 The Existence of God

    Addressed to the Theophilanthropists, the Paris society whose creed matched Paine's own, it gives the positive side of the case that The Age of Reason made against revealed religion.

    EN

NEW YORK — THE LAST YEARS AND THE PROPHECIES

  1. 1807 Examination of the Prophecies

    A companion to The Age of Reason, giving the Gospels' use of prophecy the same close reading that its second part gave the authorship of the Bible.

    EN
Begin a dialogue with Thomas Paine

— or wander to another mind

Set two minds against each other

Each of these is a question the two of them answer differently. Choose one and they argue it out, both drawing on the texts held here.