The Universe as the Only Bible God Signed
What could prove God to someone who trusts only what can be observed? The motion of the planets, Paine argues, which matter cannot give itself.
Paine named two enemies of religion, fanaticism and atheism, and spent his discourse on the second. The universe is the only Bible that carries God's signature, because it is the one thing people could not have written. Atheists explain the world by the properties of matter, but motion is not one of those properties: if it were, perpetual motion would be possible, and it is not. Something outside matter set the planets circling the sun. From there he asked the Society to teach the sciences as the study of the Creator's work, and told it that persecution had bred atheism.
- natural theology
- motion
- cosmological argument
- matter
- atheism
- materialism
- science and religion
- first cause
- gravitation
- solar system
- divine power
- concept of god
- arguments for god
- science education
- mathematics
- public education
- education
- religious violence
- religious toleration
- reason and belief
Enter a dialogue
- Why should a doubter of every book trust the universe as a Bible, merely because no human hand could make it?
- Were motion a property of matter, you argue, a perpetual-motion machine would already exist. Why is its impossibility proof about planets, not just a fact about machines?
- A top stays up only while it spins, and planets avoid falling into the sun only by circling. Why is gravity not what sets them moving?
- Human will knows no limit, yet human power is small. Why would a being whose power equalled its will be God?
- Mechanics would learn the mathematics of their trades and farmers how plants grow, each shown God's hand in it. What do workers gain from learning that way?