Revelation Is Hearsay After the First Hearer
If God spoke to someone once, what reaches everyone else? Only that person's report, Paine answers, and nobody is bound to believe a report as if it were the voice of God.
What Paine rejected was not God but revelation: the claim that God spoke to certain men and that everyone else is bound by their account of it. Whatever the first hearer received was revelation to him alone; for everyone after him it is hearsay, resting on the word of a person who may have been mistaken. A church built on such reports asks for belief in its messengers, and Paine refuses the demand, since a report can never carry more authority than the credibility of whoever passes it on.
- revelation
- testimony
- religious authority
- scriptural authority
- epistemology
- evidence
- miracles
- reason
- christianity
- atonement
Enter a dialogue
- Jews, Christians and Muslims each have a book they call the Word of God, yet accuse one another of unbelief. Why does that count against all three?
- Nature has never been seen leaving her course, yet millions of lies are told. Why does that put the odds against a miracle at millions to one?
- A man who professes a creed he does not believe has prepared himself for any crime, you say. Why is that mental lying so destructive to morality?
- You say Christians cite the Jews, who deny the resurrection, as proof that it happened. Why is that like proving a claim by producing its deniers?
- The early churchmen voted on which books count as the word of God, and the majority decided. Why is that, for you, no authority at all?