A Principle at Stake, Not the Price of Tea
Did the Americans go to war over a small tax, as Europe had been told? Paine grants the sum was trivial and says that was exactly the point.
The Abbé Raynal had told European readers that the Revolution had no great cause: no martyrs, no trampled laws, only a quarrel over whether Parliament might levy a small tax. Paine agreed the tea duty was trivial and turned that against him. Parliament kept the tax as a test of its claim to make laws for the colonies on any matter it chose, and the Americans resisted the claim, not the amount. He was as exact about the record, showing from the dates that Congress refused Britain's peace offers of 1778 before it knew of the French alliance.
- taxation
- independence
- revolution
- liberty
- political authority
- government
- colonialism
- historical causation
- causation
- motivation
- historical evidence
- historical interpretation
- historiography
- political judgment
Enter a dialogue
- What do you say to someone told their struggle was over something trivial, when to them it concerned who rules?
- Every side in a quarrel says it fights for principle, not the sum. Why believe that of Americans resisting a small tax on tea?
- Parliament claimed the right to bind the colonies 'in all cases whatsoever'. Why would that claim threaten even Englishmen's own Magna Carta and trial by jury?
- The Abbé Raynal wrote that no martyrs' blood had streamed on American scaffolds. Why did you answer that it streamed in Boston's streets in 1770?
- In America's war, every man goes to the field as sovereign of his own possessions. What does that change about how a people fights?