The Will Behind the World
Behind the visible world we perceive, is there anything at all — and if so, what one thing could a falling stone, a growing plant, and human craving all be?
Kant split appearance from the thing-in-itself and left the latter unknowable; here it is named. What we perceive is only representation, and its inner reality is a single blind striving called will — one force objectified in stone, plant, and appetite alike. The move is the whole ambition of the book: to complete Kant by identifying what he had walled off, and to read the entire universe, inner and outer, as the one will made visible.
- will
- metaphysics
- perception
- epistemology
- consciousness
- causality
- reality
- subjectivity
- intuition
- intellect
Enter a dialogue
- A person stands convinced the world outside is solidly there — on what grounds do you tell them it is only their representation?
- You name the thing-in-itself Kant walled off as unknowable, and call it will — how can you know what he proved we cannot?
- How is the will behind a falling stone the same as the will in human craving, and not merely a shared word?
- If everything inner and outer is one blind striving, what comfort of a meaningful, purposive universe does a reader give up?
- When a stranger's craving and my own feel utterly separate, why do you insist a single will moves both?