On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason, and On the Will in Nature

The doctoral thesis Schopenhauer called the foundation of everything he built later — bound here with the essay where he went looking for his metaphysics in the laboratory.

by Arthur Schopenhauer485 passages held

English, a translation held here, and your language

Original title: Ueber die vierfache Wurzel des Satzes vom zureichenden Grunde; und, Ueber den Willen in der Natur
First published: 1813(aged 25)
Original language: German

Report a rights issue

Overview

Goethe thanked the newly minted doctor for a copy, hoping to find in him an ally for his own embattled colour theory. The University of Jena had granted the degree in absentia in 1813 for this dissertation, written in a rented Rudolstadt room while Schopenhauer waited out the Napoleonic wars. Its question sounds dry and is not: why must we always be able to ask why? The principle of sufficient reason — that nothing simply is, without a ground — turns out, he argues, to be not one law but four, governing becoming, knowing, being, and acting, and confusing them has strewn philosophy with wreckage. He thought the little book the vestibule to his whole system and told readers to pass through it before The World as Will and Representation; he revised and enlarged it in 1847. His mother Johanna, a successful novelist, read the title and supposed it a manual for apothecaries, and predicted his whole edition would still be sitting unsold when hers had all been read. In the short run she was right — much of his first printing ended as waste paper while her novels found buyers — and only decades later did the reversal he wanted arrive. Bound with the dissertation here is On the Will in Nature (1836), where he ransacked physiology, magnetism, and Chinese sources for scientific confirmation that the striving he called will drives all of nature. The dissertation outlasted the scorn, and is now read as the epistemological floor the rest of Schopenhauer stands on.

Key concepts

What is the principle of sufficient reason?

It is the claim that nothing simply is: every object of our consciousness has a ground that explains why it is so and not otherwise. Schopenhauer treats this demand — the inescapable question why — as a single root-principle governing all our knowledge, and the whole book asks what that principle really is.

What are the four roots the principle divides into?

Four distinct forms of the why, one for each class of objects: becoming (physical cause and effect), knowing (the logical ground of a judgment), being (the relations of space and time), and acting (the motive behind a deed). Schopenhauer holds that confusing these four is the source of endless philosophical error.

What does Schopenhauer mean by motivation here?

The fourth root — causality seen from within. A motive works on a being that knows it exactly as a physical cause works on matter, producing its effect with the same necessity; the sole difference is that we grasp it from the inside, through self-consciousness, rather than from outside. Willing thus obeys the principle as strictly as falling stones.

Does the principle apply to the will itself?

No. The principle of sufficient reason governs only objects for a subject — the world as representation — and can never reach beyond appearances. The will as thing-in-itself, the theme of his later work, therefore has no ground and answers no why; it simply is. Fixing this boundary is what makes the little book the vestibule to the whole system.

What does On the Will in Nature argue?

That the blind striving Schopenhauer calls will is the inner reality of every force in nature, and that empirical science, read rightly, confirms it. Bound with the dissertation, this 1836 essay ransacks physiology, plant life, animal magnetism, and Chinese sources for evidence that one will drives magnet, root, and human craving alike.

Themes of the book

What this book returns to, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of the text each one occupies.

The Fourfold Root of Why

Why must we always be able to ask why — and is the demand for a ground one law or several quietly confused for one?

Nothing simply is, without a reason: the dry-sounding principle of sufficient reason turns out to govern four separate domains — becoming, knowing, being, and acting — each with its own kind of ground. Confusing them, the dissertation argues, has strewn philosophy with wreckage. Sorted, they become the epistemological floor the rest of the system stands on; Schopenhauer told readers to pass through this vestibule before opening the masterwork, and revised it in 1847 to hold that weight.

causality
epistemology
logic
perception
reason
time
space
geometry
understanding
intuition
representation
truth
principle of sufficient reason
a priori knowledge

Enter a dialogue

The Will Sought in Nature

Can the blind striving named will be found not only argued in metaphysics but confirmed in the body, the magnet, and the growing organism?

Bound with the dissertation is On the Will in Nature (1836), where Schopenhauer went looking for his metaphysics in the laboratory. He ransacked physiology, animal magnetism, and Chinese sources for evidence that the same force driving human appetite drives instinct, plant growth, and physical attraction — the will objectified through all of nature. It is the system reaching outward for empirical corroboration rather than building inward from Kant, the confident gesture of a man sure he already knew what reality was made of.

will
metaphysics
nature
biology
physiology
teleology
science
magic
theology

Enter a dialogue

Within this work

passages held: 485
distinct concepts: 604
by passages held, corpus-wide: #152

What this book thinks together

The wheel takes this book’s leading concepts and shows how often they come up together. The wider the band between two, the more of its passages speak of both. Among them, most often together: “causality” and “perception”.

Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 8 concepts, joined by 21 pairings. 88 pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
Concept	Paired concept	Shared passages
causality	perception	31
causality	principle of sufficient reason	26
causality	epistemology	22
magic	will	22
epistemology	principle of sufficient reason	19
causality	will	18
causality	metaphysics	15
metaphysics	will	14
teleology	will	12
epistemology	will	6
epistemology	perception	5
metaphysics	principle of sufficient reason	5
causality	magic	3
causality	teleology	3
epistemology	metaphysics	3
magic	metaphysics	3
perception	will	3
epistemology	magic	2
metaphysics	teleology	2
metaphysics	perception	1
principle of sufficient reason	will	1

Works held

The author's work in order, this book marked in place. Your-language title first, the original beneath it where the two differ; side chips show which full texts are held.

1813 On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason, and On the Will in Nature (Ueber die vierfache Wurzel des Satzes vom zureichenden Grunde; und, Ueber den Willen in der Natur) you are here EN
1819 The World as Will and Representation (Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung)
The masterwork, and the whole of his philosophy: one argument he refused to recast, only enlarge, across three editions between 1819 and 1859. Every other title on this shelf leads toward it or away from it.
DE
1841 The Basis of Morality (Die beiden Grundprobleme der Ethik)
Two ethics essays written for academic prize contests — one crowned in Norway, one famously denied the Danish medal though it stood alone — issued together in 1841 as The Two Fundamental Problems of Ethics.
EN
1851 Essay on Spirit Seeing and Everything Connected Therewith (Über das Geistersehn und was damit zusammenhängt)
An excursion into the paranormal — ghosts, second sight, animal magnetism — explained through his own metaphysics of will; the fifth of the six long essays in the 1851 Parerga.
DE
1851 On Women (Über die Weiber)
Notorious far beyond its length: a few hostile pages on women from the second volume of the 1851 Parerga, an embarrassment to his admirers and a standing charge against him.
DE
1851 The Essays of Arthur Schopenhauer; Counsels and Maxims (Parerga und Paralipomena)
Half of Schopenhauer's Aphorisms on the Wisdom of Life, the companion to The Wisdom of Life; Saunders split the two for English readers. Practical maxims for living, drawn from the 1851 collection.
EN
1851 The Essays of Arthur Schopenhauer; On Human Nature (Parerga und Paralipomena / Nachgelassene Schriften)
Essays on ethics and politics that Saunders gathered — some from the 1851 Parerga, some from manuscripts unpublished at his death — under a title Schopenhauer never gave them.
EN
1851 The Essays of Arthur Schopenhauer; Religion, a Dialogue, Etc. (Parerga und Paralipomena)
A dialogue on whether a useful faith can also be a false one, heading a cluster of essays on religion and art that Saunders drew from the 1851 Parerga.
EN
1851 The Essays of Arthur Schopenhauer; Studies in Pessimism (Parerga und Paralipomena)
The pessimism most readers know him by, stated without the metaphysics — Saunders' selection of the shortest, bluntest essays from the 1851 Parerga.
EN
1851 The Essays of Arthur Schopenhauer; The Art of Literature (Parerga und Paralipomena)
One of the topical selections Saunders carved from the Parerga for English readers, this one on writing, reading, and style; published in 1891.
EN
1851 The Essays of Arthur Schopenhauer: the Wisdom of Life (Aphorismen zur Lebensweisheit)
His most cheerful book, a guide to happiness that opens the Aphorisms on the Wisdom of Life; the pages John Oxenford's 1853 essay singled out when he introduced Schopenhauer to English readers.
DEEN
1864 The Essays of Arthur Schopenhauer; the Art of Controversy (Parerga und Paralipomena / Nachgelassene Schriften)
Not from the Parerga at all: a manual of thirty-eight debating tricks that Schopenhauer drafted around 1830, left unpublished, and that reached print only in 1864, from his posthumous papers.
DEEN
1892 Anmerkungen zu Locke und Kant sowie zu nachkantischen Philosophen
Undated notes from his literary remains, engaging Locke, Kant, and the post-Kantian idealists; manuscript material sorted by his editors after his death, never a book he wrote.
DE

— or open another of their works