Woman as the Will's Instrument
What verdict on a whole sex follows once it is cast as nature's device for reproduction and credited with nothing that reaches beyond it?
In a handful of contemptuous pages Schopenhauer rules that women exist to propagate the species and reach no further — that they stay childlike their whole lives and fall short of men in justice and in the disinterested contemplation that yields real art or thought. He hangs the claims on his metaphysics, casting woman as an instrument of the will-to-live's blind drive to reproduce. Even his defenders concede the essay argues little and insults much, and that it has outlived subtler work precisely because it is so quotable against him.
- species
- reproduction
- justice
- reason
- gender philosophy
- marriage
- moral psychology
- aesthetics
- art
Enter a dialogue
- You say nature gives women a few years of beauty, as it gives a female ant wings until she mates. Why would that make them lesser?
- You grant women more compassion than men yet less justice. If compassion is the root of goodness, as you hold, why should justice be their weak point?
- You hold that women exist wholly for propagating the species. Doesn't your own philosophy put men in the species' service too?
- Nature, you write, armed the lion with claws, the cuttlefish with ink and woman with deceit. If deceit is the weak's weapon, why call it a moral fault?
- You claim women cannot care for anything for its own sake, since their only power runs through a man. Doesn't that describe their position, not their nature?