Better Never to Have Been
Is life a gift with some pain mixed in, or a debt paid in suffering from the first day to the last?
Existence, Schopenhauer says without hedging, is something that had better not have happened. Willing is endless craving, every satisfied wish only clearing ground for the next; pleasure is merely the brief absence of a particular pain, and boredom floods in whenever wanting pauses. On suicide he refuses the Christian condemnation yet denies it settles anything, since death ends the individual and not the will that drove him. Taken for cultivated gloom, the essays were meant as clear sight — the refusal to pretend the world is other than it is.
- metaphysics
- will
- human nature
- ethics
- truth
- reason
- suffering
- education
- pessimism
Enter a dialogue
- A person, worn down, half-wishes they had never been born — does your philosophy meet that thought as clear sight rather than despair?
- You call existence a debt paid in suffering — but many people, asked, would not trade their lives away; are they simply deceived?
- How is your verdict that life had better not have happened different from ordinary gloom or a passing bad mood?
- To see pleasure as merely the brief absence of pain, what everyday hope of positive joy must a person surrender?
- Someone contemplates ending their life to escape suffering — you refuse to condemn it yet deny it settles anything; what do you tell them?