Compassion as the Ground of Ethics
Where does the moral in an act come from — from reason, from a divine command, from calculated self-interest, or from somewhere none of these reach?
Against Kant's ethics of duty, which Schopenhauer thought a theology in disguise, the prize essay names one source only: compassion, the immediate participation in another's suffering that makes their weal and woe matter to me as if mine. Not reason, not command, not advantage — fellow-feeling alone confers moral worth. The Danish Society, asked exactly this, refused the medal though no rival essay had been entered; the argument it declined is now among the most discussed grounds ever offered for an ethics of sympathy over law.
- ethics
- human nature
- suffering
- character
- religion
- theology
- reason
- compassion
- egoism
Enter a dialogue
- Two men plan to kill a rival in love, safe from detection, and both turn back. One cites a principle, the other sudden pity. Whose reason is moral?
- Most people, offered the choice between their own destruction and everyone else's, would sacrifice the world, on your account. If egoism is that strong, how can compassion win?
- The Swiss fighter Winkelried cried 'remember my wife and child' and gathered enemy spears into his arms. Why can no selfish motive explain it?
- The egoist harms others only to gain something, but the cruel person wants their suffering itself. Why do you count that as the deeper moral sickness?
- Kant called human dignity a value beyond comparison. You call it hollow, since every value compares one thing with another. What, then, gives anyone a claim on us?