What You Are, Not What You Have
Does a good life turn on personality, on possessions, or on the opinion others hold of you — and which of the three can you least afford to chase?
The century's foremost pessimist wrote its most serene guide to happiness. He divides the sources of a good life into three — what a man is, what he has, and what others think him — and argues that the first decides nearly everything and the last nearly nothing. Health and an even temperament outweigh any fortune; the anxious craving for reputation is the great avoidable misery. Since happiness owes more to what one is, wisdom lies in wanting less and cultivating the inner resources no loss can touch.
- human nature
- character
- intellect
- wisdom
- prudence
- vanity
- envy
- honor
- happiness
- fame
Enter a dialogue
- A person pours their life into money and reputation and stays unhappy — do you tell them what they are matters more than either?
- You rank what a man is above what he has — but poverty and a ruined name crush real people; is temperament truly enough?
- How does what a person is differ, in your account, from what they have and what others merely think of them?
- To stop chasing the good opinion of others, which you call the great avoidable misery, what craving must a person release?
- Someone is tormented by what others think of them — how do you argue this craving is the most avoidable of miseries?