Woman as the Will's Instrument
What verdict on a whole sex follows once it is cast as nature's device for reproduction and credited with nothing that reaches beyond it?
In a handful of contemptuous pages Schopenhauer rules that women exist to propagate the species and reach no further — that they stay childlike their whole lives and fall short of men in justice and in the disinterested contemplation that yields real art or thought. He hangs the claims on his metaphysics, casting woman as an instrument of the will-to-live's blind drive to reproduce. Even his defenders concede the essay argues little and insults much, and that it has outlived subtler work precisely because it is so quotable against him.
- species
- reproduction
- justice
- reason
- gender philosophy
- marriage
- moral psychology
- aesthetics
- art
Enter a dialogue
- A woman is told by this essay she exists only to propagate the species — can you defend so total a verdict on a whole sex?
- You cast woman as the will-to-live's instrument and credit her with nothing beyond it — even your defenders say this argues little; what carries it?
- What in your metaphysics actually supports the charge that women fall short in disinterested contemplation, rather than dressing prejudice as philosophy?
- To hang a whole sex's nature on the will's drive to reproduce, what must you ignore of the women who plainly reached further?
- Scholars ask whether these pages express settled conviction or the bitterness of your own feuds — which do you say drove them?