Ghosts Explained by the Will
Are apparitions and second sight fraud, visiting spirits, or something the perceiving mind manufactures with no outside body answering to it?
Schopenhauer neither joins the spiritualists nor waves the reports away. He grants that people genuinely see apparitions and foresee events, and locates the cause not outside them but within — a "dream-organ" by which the will can perceive without the senses, so that a ghost is a real perception with nothing external behind it. It fits his system exactly: if the will and not the physical world is ultimate reality, one mind reaching another across distance or death is no miracle. The result is credited among the earliest philosophies of the paranormal.
- perception
- will
- dreaming
- somnambulism
- clairvoyance
- consciousness
- hallucination
- physiology
- metaphysics
- prophecy
- vision
Enter a dialogue
- A person is certain they saw someone who could not have been there — can your dream-organ explain a real perception with nothing outside it?
- You explain apparitions as the will perceiving without the senses — but how does that differ from simply calling them hallucinations?
- Between the spiritualist's visiting ghost and the sceptic's charge of fraud, where does your dream-organ place second sight?
- To accept a ghost as a real perception with no body behind it, what ordinary trust in the senses must a person let go?
- When someone foresees an event and it comes true, is the will reaching across distance, or only coincidence dressed as prophecy?