Ruling Oneself First
Who is fit to govern a household, or a city, if no one can see their own faults? The treatise answers by turning governance inward before it turns outward.
The book opens by defending inequality: if all were kings they would destroy one another, if all were subjects they would perish, and a learned poor man never doubts he is worth more than an ignorant rich one, so each accepts his lot. Governance then begins with the self. A man should measure his character against other people's, set himself rewards and punishments, and keep a wise, loving friend who shows him his faults like a mirror. Rulers need that friend most, because they grow used to indulging themselves and bad companions gather round them.
- virtue ethics
- self-knowledge
- friendship
- moral reform
- moral psychology
- leadership
- trust
- practical wisdom
- political philosophy
- social hierarchy
- human nature
Enter a dialogue
- If all were kings, you argue, they would wipe one another out, and if all were subjects they would perish. Why is inequality a mercy, not an injustice?
- A learned poor man never doubts he is worth more than an ignorant rich one. Is that contentment wisdom, or a comfort that keeps the poor quiet?
- No one judges his own faults honestly, you write, so everyone needs a wise, loving friend as a mirror. What makes someone fit for that task?
- People should reward their soul when it accepts virtue and punish it when it resists, you advise. Can anyone be their own master and pupil at once?
- A profit won through sin, shame or lost dignity is worthless however large, you write. How should someone weigh a tempting gain that would cost them their self-respect?