God Beyond Human Measures
How can anyone speak of God's knowing, willing and giving when even the true nature of a body escapes us? The notes keep testing every human picture of God and setting it aside.
The notes start from a blunt limit: people know the properties and concomitants of things, never what makes a body a body, and they do not know the true nature of God, the intellect or the soul. Within that limit they press hard. God knows an eclipse through its causes, not by pointing at this eclipse now. His knowing himself as the source of things is their existence. He gives without any purpose beyond the giving, which is what generosity means and trade does not. The Muʿtazila are faulted for modelling his will on a man's.
- divine knowledge
- causation
- necessary existence
- divine simplicity
- divine attributes
- existence
- metaphysics
- universals
- particulars
- relations
- will
- causality
- individuation
Enter a dialogue
- One note admits that no human knows what makes even a body a body. How then can these notes say so much about God?
- God knows an eclipse through its causes, you argue, never as "this eclipse, now". Does a God who knows that way know what befalls any one person?
- Giving in order to get something back is trade, a note says, and true generosity seeks no return at all. Can a human being ever give like that?
- The Muʿtazila, rationalist theologians, proved God has no body, then pictured his will like a man's, choosing to act or not. What did they get wrong?
- God always gives existence, on your account, and if something fails to receive it, the failure is the receiver's. What could hold a thing back from God's giving?