What 'I' Refers To
When someone says 'I', do they mean the body others can see? The epistle answers no, and rests the soul's survival on that answer.
Most people, and many theologians, the epistle says, take the human being to be this visible body. Against them it argues that what each person calls 'I' is a substance that is not a body. The body is always wasting and being rebuilt from food, yet a person remembers a whole life and knows himself to be the same throughout. Seeing, desiring, walking and thinking are all gathered by one thing that no bodily part can be. Because that substance moves and governs the body, the body's ruin cannot touch its existence.
- soul-body dualism
- soul-body relation
- personal identity
- soul
- intellect
- perception
- immortality
Enter a dialogue
- Everyone says "I", yet most people and many theologians take it to mean this visible body. Why are they mistaken, on your account?
- "I saw it and wanted it, I took it with my hand." What gathers seeing, wanting and grasping into one, if no part of the body can?
- The soul moves and governs the body, so it is the stronger and cannot perish with it, you argue. Does a rider outlast a horse by steering it?
- An old man barely resembles the child he once was, yet he knows that child was him. What does that certainty show about who he is?