Out of the Sea of Errors
What must a person know to stop drowning in mistaken opinions? Friends asked Avicenna for the minimum, and he began with the rules that tell a sound argument from a plausible one.
The preface promises a book for anyone who wants to stand apart from the common run and hold the principles of philosophy, and its logic is built for certainty alone. It skips the arts of debate, persuasion and poetry and goes straight to what a proof may start from: truths no sane person doubts, such as that the whole is greater than the part, what the senses show, what repeated experience confirms, and reports so widespread that no one questions them. On these it builds the syllogism and the demonstration that shows why a thing is so.
- logic
- syllogistic
- definition
- demonstration
- modality
- modal logic
- necessity
- universals
- essence
Enter a dialogue
- Friends asked you for one book to save them from drowning in a sea of errors. Why must such a rescue begin with logic?
- Your friends wanted a book for those who would stand apart from the common people. Is philosophy then only for the few, on your account?
- Scammony, a purging herb, works every time it is taken, and physicians come to rely on it. What turns repeated sightings into knowledge rather than luck?
- Most of what we believe about distant places and past events reaches us only through what others report. When can such reports give real certainty?
- Your short logic drops the arts of debate, persuasion and poetry entirely. What does someone who only wants the truth lose by skipping them?