Five Ways of Saying One Thing of Another
When we call a person an animal, rational, able to laugh or white, are we saying the same kind of thing each time? Everything later in logic, from definition to proof, depends on keeping these apart.
Avicenna keeps Porphyry's five terms, genus, species, difference, property and general accident, but rebuilds the ground under them. The decisive line runs between what is essential to a thing, which constitutes it and cannot be thought away, and what merely belongs to it, however reliably. Being able to laugh belongs to every human and to nothing else, yet it follows from being human rather than making one human. Chapter by chapter he states what earlier writers said about each term and then corrects them, so that definition, the work of the later books, rests on firm distinctions.
- predication
- definition
- differentia
- genus
- species
- predicables
- classification
- accidents
- genus and species
- properties
- essential properties
- general accident
- essence
Enter a dialogue
- Porphyry, whose textbook opened every logic course, counted five ways one word is said of another. Why do you keep his five yet rebuild everything beneath them?
- Every human can laugh and nothing else can. Why can laughter not define a human as well as reason does?
- A difference like "rational" both splits the animals into kinds and builds the human being. How can one feature do two such different jobs?
- Chapter after chapter you report what earlier logicians said about Porphyry's five terms and then correct them. What had they gone wrong about?
- A triangle's angles always add up to two right angles, yet that is no part of what a triangle is. Why does such a feature matter for definition?