The Science of Being
What is the highest science actually about, if the God it seeks is something it has first to prove? Avicenna's answer gave metaphysics the subject it kept for centuries.
No science proves that its own subject exists, Avicenna argues, and metaphysics has to prove that God exists, so God cannot be its subject. Its subject is the existent insofar as it exists, studied not as moving body, as physics studies it, nor as magnitude, as geometry does. Existent, thing and necessary are the first notions, printed on the mind and explained by nothing clearer. From them the book works through substance, unity, number, matter and form, and the difference between what a thing is and the fact that it is.
- metaphysics
- essence
- unity
- substance
- definition
- existence
- universals
- individuation
- accidents
- quantity
- number
- matter
- matter and form
- potentiality
Enter a dialogue
- No science proves that its own subject exists, you argue, and metaphysics must prove that God exists. So what is metaphysics about, if not God?
- Existent, thing and necessary, you say, are printed on the mind from the start, and nothing clearer explains them. How can we reason with ideas we cannot define?
- Two people share everything that makes them human. What makes each of them this one person rather than the other?
- Physics already studies moving bodies and geometry studies magnitude. What is left for a science of being to discover that they cannot?
- Whatever exists, you hold, is also in some way one. Then how can a crowd, an army or a heap of stones be one thing?