One test for any government
By what single measure should a government be judged good or bad? Bentham answers with one alone: whether it produces the happiness of the governed, with nothing else allowed to count.
The greatest happiness of the greatest number gets its first public statement here, and Bentham turns it into a blade. Against Blackstone, who described the constitution as though describing it were praising it, he insists no institution earns respect for being old, established, or English. It earns respect only by its results. A law is to be measured, not expounded, and measured by one thing: the happiness it yields for those who live under it. Everything he wrote afterward runs on this single rule.
- utility
- legislation
- jurisprudence
- ethics
- methodology
- political obligation
Enter a dialogue
- When someone obeys a law that plainly harms them, what should weigh in deciding whether it still binds?
- Isn't reducing every law to the happiness it yields a way to license any cruelty that can be dressed up as useful?
- How does judging a constitution by its results differ from the reverence Blackstone paid it merely for being old?
- If age and custom count for nothing in an institution's favour, what must a people be ready to defend without them?
- What should a reformer answer when told a bad law must be kept simply because it is the law?