One test for any government
By what single measure should a government be judged good or bad? Bentham answers with one alone: whether it produces the happiness of the governed, with nothing else allowed to count.
The greatest happiness of the greatest number gets its first public statement here, and Bentham turns it into a blade. Against Blackstone, who described the constitution as though describing it were praising it, he insists no institution earns respect for being old, established, or English. It earns respect only by its results. A law is to be measured, not expounded, and measured by one thing: the happiness it yields for those who live under it. Everything he wrote afterward runs on this single rule.
- utility
- legislation
- jurisprudence
- ethics
- methodology
- political obligation
Enter a dialogue
- What should a reformer answer when told a bad law must be kept simply because it is the law?
- A subject may resist, on your test, when the likely harm of resisting is less than the harm of submitting. Is each person to make that calculation alone?
- The Expositor says what the law is and the Censor what it ought to be. Why do you call only the Censor a citizen of the world?
- Blackstone said the House of Lords grows wise by experience. Yet its members sit for life, already rich. Does experience come to those with nothing to gain?
- Blackstone says rulers should have wisdom, goodness and power, the attributes of God himself. Why did you find such a standard useless for judging a government?