A tax that gives something back
Can a tax be softened so it does not simply take? Bentham proposes pairing a levy with a grant of monopoly, so the payer receives, in the privilege, an offset for what the tax removes.
Surveying every source from which a government at war might raise money, Bentham hit on this scheme: pair a tax with a grant of monopoly, so the party taxed receives, in the exclusive privilege, something that offsets what the tax takes. The state gets its revenue; the payer is compensated rather than simply mulcted. It is Bentham the fiscal engineer, turning his calculus of gain and loss on the dry machinery of public finance, hunting to spread the pain more cleverly than a blunt levy. A minor and technical piece, it had almost no influence and survives mainly as a specimen of how relentlessly he costed everything.
- monopoly
- taxation
- banking
- competition
- public welfare
- accessibility
Enter a dialogue
- Taxing a trader's profits usually fails, because profits are hard to measure and inspection breeds oppression. Why did you think stockbrokers and bankers escape those objections?
- A tax feels like pure loss to the person who pays it. How can an exclusive right to trade, granted in return, turn it into a fair exchange?
- Handing a monopoly to offset a tax sounds clever, but doesn't the public pay twice, once in the tax and again in the monopolist's higher prices?
- A banker's customers do not want their money dealings known to rivals. How did you propose to check the banker's profit without spreading those secrets?
- You argued that bankers could not raise the price of loans by becoming fewer. Why is the rate of interest beyond their control?