Pleasure and pain, the only masters
What actually governs what people do, and what alone can measure good and bad? Bentham answers with two sovereign masters, pleasure and pain, and refuses any third standard.
Nature has placed mankind under two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure; from that opening Bentham builds the whole machinery. Good and bad reduce to them and to nothing else, so a legislator can weigh any act by the pleasure and pain it brings, gauged by intensity, duration, certainty and nearness. A famous footnote asks whether the capacity to suffer, not to reason or to speak, is what earns a creature moral standing, a line the movement against cruelty to animals later claimed. Sentiment and intuition are dismissed as disguised preference.
- utility
- sensibility
- psychology
- ethics
- punishment
Enter a dialogue
- A man denies himself every comfort, believing pain is a virtue in itself. On your account, where did that belief go wrong?
- Whoever argues against your test of happiness borrows reasons from it, like a man who needs another earth to move this one. Is that proof or trick?
- The same blow hurts people differently, depending on health, age, rank and climate. How can a law weigh one person's suffering against another's?
- Ancient jurists, you write, degraded animals into things through their insensibility. What should the law owe a creature that can feel pleasure and pain?
- Your list of fourteen pleasures includes malevolence, delight in another's suffering. How can a pleasure that needs someone else's pain count as good at all?