Logic Bent Toward Use
Logic is not the study of the syllogism but the art of directing the mind in whatever it undertakes; and thinking toward truth is a different business from thinking toward action.
For most of its history logic meant valid inference, the syllogism and its rules. Bentham sets that aside almost at once and redefines the subject far more widely: the art of directing the mind toward an end, the discipline of thinking well rather than the mere mechanics of deduction. He separates a logic of the understanding, concerned with getting at truth, from a logic of the will, concerned with acting to some purpose. Like everything he wrote, it is logic bent toward use, a set of tools for ordering thought so error has fewer places to hide, an art of practical reasoning rather than a science of proof.
- methodology
- logic
- classification
- language
Enter a dialogue
- For someone taught logic as a set of valid forms, what is gained by treating it instead as an art of thinking toward an end?
- Isn't calling logic the art of directing the mind so broad that it stops being logic and becomes merely thinking well?
- How would you tell the logic of the understanding, aimed at truth, from the logic of the will, aimed at getting something done?
- What does a thinker give up by refusing to treat the syllogism as the core of logic?
- If your logic was a dead end for the formal science, why should a reader today take up your conception of it at all?