Why Would God Speak?
If reason already tells everyone their duty, what could a revelation be for? Fichte answers by asking who cannot hear reason.
The moral law, Fichte argues, makes us demand a happiness matched to our worth, and so leads to God as moral lawgiver: that is religion as reason finds it. A revelation is the same God announced through an event in the world of the senses. It would be more honourable for humanity if reason's religion were always enough, he concedes, but people crushed by need hear no law except hunger, and for them God may stoop to be a teacher, waking the moral feeling through the senses themselves.
- revelation
- divine revelation
- religion
- natural religion
- philosophy of religion
- moral motivation
- sensibility
- desire
- moral psychology
- moral education
- happiness
- faith
- god
- theology
Enter a dialogue
- A revelation, you argue, is God announcing himself as moral lawgiver through an effect in the visible world. Why would reason's God need such a sign?
- People crushed by need, you write, can think only of the present and hear no law but hunger. How could a moral feeling ever wake in them?
- Where the senses drown out the moral law, you suggest, God might speak through the senses themselves. Why would that reach people when reason cannot?
- It would be more honourable for humanity, you admit, if reason's religion were always enough. Why would God still stoop to playing the teacher?
- The moral law, you argue, makes us demand a happiness matching our worth, and so leads to God. Does that not let reward back into morality?