One Firm Ground
What turns a heap of true statements into a science? Fichte's answer sets philosophy a task no one had yet completed.
A science, Fichte argues, is a whole whose parts all rest on one ground certain before the system begins, as a building stands firm because every wall rests on its foundation. Strict reasoning alone is not enough: a perfectly connected natural history of air spirits would still not be a science, because its first claim is groundless. Philosophy therefore has to become a Wissenschaftslehre, the science of what makes every science possible, and even logic, which supplies only the form of thought, turns out to be a separate science outside it.
- philosophy of science
- first principles
- systematicity
- systematic philosophy
- foundations of knowledge
- foundationalism
- scientific method
- logic
- knowledge
- science
- definition
- completeness
- epistemology
Enter a dialogue
- You compare a science to a building whose whole purpose is to stand firm on its foundation. What can philosophy build on, with no solid earth beneath it?
- A natural history of spirits living in the air could be argued with perfect rigour, you say, and still not be a science. What would it lack?
- Every other science, you write, already has its plot of land, and only one field lies untilled: a science of science itself. What would grow there?
- Two sceptical writers, you admit, convinced you that philosophy is not yet a science. What did they show that left the whole field without firm ground?