Five Ages of Humanity
Does history have a shape that thinking alone can reveal? Fichte claims it does, and finds his own century halfway along it.
Fichte presupposes a world plan, a single idea of humanity's earthly life from which its main epochs follow. Reason first rules blindly, as instinct; then that instinct hardens into outside authority; then people free themselves from authority and from reason with it; then reason returns as knowledge, and at last humanity shapes itself freely into reason's image. Behind it all stands an original 'normal people' living by reason without science or art, so contented that it left no history, since one day passed like the next.
- philosophy of history
- historical development
- historical method
- historical philosophy
- reason
- human nature
- metaphysics
- speculation
Enter a dialogue
- You divide all of history into five ages, from innocent instinct to reason shaping itself freely, and place your own time at the exact midpoint. Why there?
- Your original "normal people" lived wholly by reason, with no science or art, and left no history behind. Why does a perfect people have no story to tell?
- You admit you do not derive your plan of world history here but simply presuppose it. What keeps your five ages from being a story you made up?
- Your map moves history from reason working blindly as instinct to reason known and freely applied. Why must humanity lose its innocence along the way?
- Someone feels their own era is at once the most enlightened and the most lost. Can your map of history explain how both could be true?